3 fl fossils for id please folks. Hawthorn Formation

[Fossilnoodlechamp]

Hello would like some opinions of these 2 fossils from the Hawthorn formation. I am hoping yall tell me some good news. Thanks very much to everybody that took the time to comment and help me through my newbie struggles. It really is truly appreciated very much. 

G.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Fossildude19]

@Boesse  @Harry Pristis  @jcbshark  @Shellseeker  @Sacha

 

Try taking photos of your items laying flat on a solid background with good lighting.

 

 

 

 

[Fossilnoodlechamp]

[Shellseeker]

For comparison: 2nd Photo is a personal find from Hawthorn Fm; The only other large whale tooth from South Florida is Scaldicetus .sp, but I think this shape more likely Kogiopsis.

Edited June 6, 2022 by Shellseeker

[Shellseeker]

 

Best Practices:

Measurements please. Please state the Diameter of the fatter end and the length in millemeters.

You left out the most important photos...

Please photo directly down on the 2 "ends"   ,  Thanks Jack

 

[SawTooth]

looks a bit like a whale ear fragment.

[fossilhunter21]

 

This definitely looks like a whale tooth. And a very large one it is!

 

-Micah

[Fossilnoodlechamp]

16 hours ago, Shellseeker said:

 

Best Practices:

Measurements please. Please state the Diameter of the fatter end and the length in millemeters.

You left out the most important photos...

Please photo directly down on the 2 "ends"   ,  Thanks Jack

 

Thx will do that now, silly question but does the chandler bridge formation run along the edge of the east coast and ne corner of florida? Or strictly located in south carolina I believe.

[Fossilnoodlechamp]

On 6/6/2022 at 12:47 PM, Shellseeker said:

 

Best Practices:

Measurements please. Please state the Diameter of the fatter end and the length in millemeters.

You left out the most important photos...

Please photo directly down on the 2 "ends"   ,  Thanks Jack

Thanks Jack, will these work?

 

[Shellseeker]

I was thinking of 3 possibilities:

1) It could have been tusk.  But Tusk has Schreger lines,  and I do not see any Schreger lines... so not tusk.

2) it could have been broken roots of a Mammoth tooth, but that has a distinctive pattern of circular enamel around the outer edge.  No circular enamel == not Mammoth tooth root.

3) It is a canine. The oval pattern makes me think upper canine of a felid.

Something like this that I have never identified:

 

That is my best guess. Someone else needs to take it from here.

 

[Fossilnoodlechamp]

Wow I only hunt one site and land mammal stuf is very rare at it. Thanks this is an amazing site. I finally learned how to react to comments and such.