cngodles Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 (edited) Whatever this fish tooth is, I've never found one before. I had a small sliver showing in a rock and spent over an hour slowly air scribing over it and getting it to this point. I'm hesitant to go much further, as I may break it. I considered Polyacrodus for the shape, but I see none with the pitted pattern that this has. Tired of trying to ID Pennsylvanian fish teeth yet, @connorp? Maybe this is another paver type teeth from a ray, etc. For scale, the length of the tooth in the first photo is 13 mm. Edited July 4, 2022 by cngodles measurement. 6 Fossils of Parks Township - Research | Catalog | How-to Make High-Contrast Photos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Hunter Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 Could it be bryzoan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cngodles Posted July 4, 2022 Author Share Posted July 4, 2022 I found another pitted tooth in the same strata two years ago (CG-0101 Detalodus sp., photo below). They do look similar to bryozoans, but I think the spacing and size of the holes that the zooids live is different. I think bryozoan are usually more oval shaped and usually lined up. The pits on this are more randomly distributed and rounded. But, I won't rule it out. I just feel that it's unlikely with the shape and size of this. 1 Fossils of Parks Township - Research | Catalog | How-to Make High-Contrast Photos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cngodles Posted July 4, 2022 Author Share Posted July 4, 2022 I am leaning towards Orodus. The size and shape seem to fit well. Fossils of Parks Township - Research | Catalog | How-to Make High-Contrast Photos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misha Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Lone Hunter said: Could it be bryzoan? Holocephalian crusher teeth can look a lot like bryozoa but they often have a specific shape to them, with more sparse, finer pitting, and they are made up of enamel unlike bryozoa. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connorp Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 Orodus seems reasonable.* Nice tooth. * "Distinguishing between isolated orodont and eugeneodont teeth is still a hazardous occupation, often becoming a matter of arbitrary and intuitive opinion." (Handbook of Paleoichthyology Vol. 3D) 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cngodles Posted July 4, 2022 Author Share Posted July 4, 2022 (edited) 8 hours ago, connorp said: Distinguishing between isolated orodont and eugeneodont teeth is still a hazardous occupation, often becoming a matter of arbitrary and intuitive opinion I agree with that. Photos online run a wide gamut. Now I need to figure out if I should just stop prepping it or go a little further. Thank you all. Also some interesting features within the order: These are a mesio-distally elongated crushing tooth. The lateral cusps are fused with the center. Gives it the smooth flowing appearance from center cusp to the lateral ones. (There is one broken/missing on mine, it was outside of the matrix, so likely eroded away) The pitted appearance of the crown is due to composition of tubular dentine. As for pitted dentine, which is a feature often with crushing type teeth, I have a microscopic photo of this feature. My Detalodus tooth specimen was broken when I found it. You can see the channels that run through the tooth, the surface is at the top of the photo. Edited July 4, 2022 by cngodles Fossils of Parks Township - Research | Catalog | How-to Make High-Contrast Photos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now