Jump to content

saskatchwean corals? 2/3


ottawafossil

Recommended Posts

2/3

found these on shore of Lake Diefenbaker in Saskatchewan, Canada. looked to be eroded from sandy deposits with layers of harder iron-rich rusty strata. the fossils themselves are heavy, mineralized with iron and then rusted? corals? all the same type or different? i think this is in cretaceous age but not sure. see other 2 posts

 

these specimens are larger, very heavy. like solid iron, looks like outer textured surface mineralized and inner cavity separate - looks like central tubular structure did not mineralized (still sandy) in one pic (could scrape out with toothpick)

273E065A-9783-45F4-B1DD-6A6049B453F7.jpeg

99B9A4F3-2D91-49B1-995C-B6472BE9A2BE.jpeg

B900D1C7-DA9D-4161-BACE-817AC9F23B5D.jpeg

55B674C0-D9D5-4E01-9822-E31AA8931CA3.jpeg

66380368-4132-4E4A-ACBF-4656943AB0C0.jpeg

9E3D0AF5-5738-4EE5-B395-8FFFB8E3152C.jpeg

9074F59D-13BF-4487-A6B1-497D135C6616.jpeg

C1697E83-C4DE-49D0-9753-5BA2618FADE8.jpeg

8D3E17CB-19D1-441C-B183-B53A0C041E10.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

update from responses to post 3/3 here: 

which identified co-occurrence with smaller (1-2cm diam, hollow, nodular) ophiomorpha (nodosa?) decapod trace burrows in late cretaceous sandy deposits from (probably) shallow marine environment of north american interior seaway (Bearpaw sea)

 

so these look to be from the same strata as the ophiomorpha trace burrows but appear different in several ways: larger (6-12” long, 3-4cm diam), not nodular, not hollow.

 

any ideas?

 

 

Edited by ottawafossil
adding updated info from responses to related post
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...