Jump to content

Shark teeth ID requested!


Lmsolliday

Recommended Posts

New collector seeking help with ID…I tried to research on my own and seem to only get more confused.  Trying to learn!

A09E6DFE-704D-4D8E-8E4F-F04DACB0E38A.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey!

Top row from left to right: C.leucas (bull shark), Hemipristis serra, C.leucas

Bottom row: not sure (hastalis?), carcharhinus x3

 

I could be wrong so I may stand corrected 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom row on the left is a Lemon shark (Negaprion sp.) but the rest, besides the Hemi, are carcharhinus!

  • I Agree 1

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first thought on the bottom left was retroflexus. Lemon shark teeth tend to be small. How large is this tooth? 

I also wonder if the second on the bottom row is a contortus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry!  I realize now I didn’t include anything to show size in the picture.  I’ll do better in the future, but the light-colored one on the bottom left is just a smidge over a 1/2 inch long.  Definitely not a lemon shark - I feel like that’s the only kind I’m sure of…that and sand tiger!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Lmsolliday said:

Sorry!  I realize now I didn’t include anything to show size in the picture.  I’ll do better in the future, but the light-colored one on the bottom left is just a smidge over a 1/2 inch long.  Definitely not a lemon shark - I feel like that’s the only kind I’m sure of…that and sand tiger!

That would be a honker lemon. So yeah, I think it's a mako (possibly retroflexus) or hastalis. Hard to tell with the root that incomplete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, debivort said:

I also wonder if the second on the bottom row is a contortus.

After looking at the photo properly magnified, I now think it's a Carcharinus, as others suggested, but with the pathology illustrated here: carcharhinus-pathology-shark-teeth.jpg

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting!  I was first wondering if the one on the top right was pathological, but looking closer, maybe bite damage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lmsolliday said:

Very interesting!  I was first wondering if the one on the top right was pathological, but looking closer, maybe bite damage?

I agree it's probably feeding damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, debivort said:

That would be a honker lemon. So yeah, I think it's a mako (possibly retroflexus) or hastalis. Hard to tell with the root that incomplete.

Maybe I'm insane - I've found a bunch of lemons that big! I don't think we get retroflexus here in Florida.

  • I Agree 1

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@debivort I stand by the lemon shark ID. Here’s 10 examples that are easily over a half-inch from my own collection. Ruler is in inches:

81D13669-3E58-4D47-9994-37D55042BA52.thumb.jpeg.98796d5a71531dc69636fca64223f939.jpeg
 

for comparison - my smaller makos that may possibly be confused with lemon. Note the top of the blade gets much wider as it meets the root, and also the root-blade boundary is very flat - something a lemon shark doesn’t do, and also that @Lmsolliday’S tooth in question doesn’t do:

0BDE3CE7-A2C5-404E-BE4B-39F073AFBCD8.thumb.jpeg.ba1c8ca7681f1bd337fca476905e1597.jpeg

Edited by Meganeura

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with @Meganeura on the IDs excepting the lower left.  I just don't know.  

Question:  are the top row, farthest left tooth and bottom row, 2nd from left very thin in cross-section?  If so, they are likely Carcharhinus plumbeus, the sandbar shark.

Edited by hemipristis
  • I Agree 1

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Meganeura said:

 I stand by the lemon shark ID. Here’s 10 examples that are easily over a half-inch from my own collection. Ruler is in inches:

I'm persuaded! I think I had a brain blip about the actual scale of 1/2''. However, in my defense, here are the hastalis and mako teeth in my collection I was thinking were a close match (scale bar is 1 inch)

 

1337523035_ScreenShot2022-09-21at12_42_08PM.png.7633a725910e0562cfb7d4043cabdb75.png

I wonder if it's just luck that I've only ever found small lemons, or whether they are generally smaller in SC than FL:

 

315472213_ScreenShot2022-09-21at12_45_05PM.png.7bae1c65fe0ff25fc2a85be3248f9c7c.png

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, debivort said:

I'm persuaded! I think I had a brain blip about the actual scale of 1/2''. However, in my defense, here are the hastalis and mako teeth in my collection I was thinking were a close match (scale bar is 1 inch)

 

1337523035_ScreenShot2022-09-21at12_42_08PM.png.7633a725910e0562cfb7d4043cabdb75.png

I wonder if it's just luck that I've only ever found small lemons, or whether they are generally smaller in SC than FL:

 

315472213_ScreenShot2022-09-21at12_45_05PM.png.7bae1c65fe0ff25fc2a85be3248f9c7c.png

I think I actually remember reading somewhere that lemons ARE smaller in SC - but I can't remember where, so take that with a grain of salt.

As far as the Mako's go - yeah, the lowers do get to be pretty similar looking, but they've got the same root thing going on. Lemons have a "lip" where the root comes down onto the blade, whereas the blade on Makos comes up to meet the root, if that makes sense! At least in my experience, anyway.

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.  The reason I dismissed lemon on that one is it’s so thin and flat compared to every other lemon I’ve ever seen.  But then I am not experienced enough to know the nuances between most teeth.  More pictures of it below.

42DBA4C9-C4A4-4739-8804-647DD2BFEDBB.jpeg

0B694CA7-6254-46D9-9EFA-3882E35CC856.jpeg

B918452C-C865-45BB-98BE-D4EBD6FFA454.jpeg

A20D2C57-EAAE-4BE5-B931-525A542D0F97.jpeg

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lmsolliday said:

Interesting.  The reason I dismissed lemon on that one is it’s so thin and flat compared to every other lemon I’ve ever seen.  But then I am not experienced enough to know the nuances between most teeth.  More pictures of it below.

42DBA4C9-C4A4-4739-8804-647DD2BFEDBB.jpeg

0B694CA7-6254-46D9-9EFA-3882E35CC856.jpeg

B918452C-C865-45BB-98BE-D4EBD6FFA454.jpeg

A20D2C57-EAAE-4BE5-B931-525A542D0F97.jpeg

That actually solidifies it as lemon for me - the "lip" I mentioned is much clearer. Also I think tooth position has an effect on how thick shark teeth are? But regardless that's a pretty standard thickness for lemons here. They're not all that thick in my experience!

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lemons are quit cylindrical in SC. These new pictures make this tooth seem even more different than my lemons, I have to say. But the regional variation is probably real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s very different from any lemon I have or have seen.  Every one I’ve seen is very cylindrical…not quite like a sand tiger, but more like that shape than this wider, flatter one.  The six bottom ones in the picture below are what I believed to be lemon, compared to the tooth we’re discussing.  Curious!

4A0194FE-A21E-44B4-B2D9-71BB6CD57A40.jpeg

Edited by Lmsolliday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Lmsolliday said:

It’s very different from any lemon I have or have seen.  Every one I’ve seen is very cylindrical…not quite like a sand tiger, but more like that shape than this wider, flatter one.  The six bottom ones in the picture below are what I believed to be lemon, compared to the tooth we’re discussing.  Curious!

4A0194FE-A21E-44B4-B2D9-71BB6CD57A40.jpeg

Except the furthest left tooth, the remaining teeth in the bottom row are Carcharinifom teeth from the lower jaws. The order Carcharhiniforms includes all of the Carcharhinus sharks, as well as lemon sharks and others.

 

The singular tooth in the top row however, is an upper tooth.  At first I thought perhaps Carchroides catticus, but it is slightly curved (which C. catticus teeth generally are not). and the root intrudes too far down the blade. 

Edited by hemipristis

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Meganeura said:

I think I actually remember reading somewhere that lemons ARE smaller in SC - but I can't remember where, so take that with a grain of salt.

 

16 hours ago, debivort said:

Lemons are quit cylindrical in SC. These new pictures make this tooth seem even more different than my lemons, I have to say. But the regional variation is probably real.

In looking at the healthy numbers of lemon shark teeth that I've collected or bought, I feel confident in stating that lemon shark teeth get larger as one proceeds south along the US East Coast.  Florida has some real honkers 1"+, but I have not seen any which approach that size from the Carolinas, and most aren't but 2/3 that size 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 1

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, hemipristis said:

Except the furthest left tooth, the remaining teeth in the bottom row are Carcharinifom teeth from the lower jaws. The order Carcharhiniforms includes all of the Carcharhinus sharks, as well as lemon sharks and others.

 

The singular tooth in the top row however, is an upper tooth.  At first I thought perhaps Carchroides catticus, but it is slightly curved (which C. catticus teeth generally are not). and the root intrudes too far down the blade. 

I’ve also never seen any C. catticus teeth here - though I hunt in Central Fl, not North, so no Oligocene down here. Couple sand tigers that look similar though. 

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Meganeura said:

I’ve also never seen any C. catticus teeth here - though I hunt in Central Fl, not North, so no Oligocene down here. Couple sand tigers that look similar though. 

I've seen only one, and snatched it up at an auction as fast as I could type because it was the only one I've ever seen from FL

  • Enjoyed 1

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, hemipristis said:

I've seen only one, and snatched it up at an auction as fast as I could type because it was the only one I've ever seen from FL

North Fl I assume?

Fossils? I dig it. :meg:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hemipristis said:

The singular tooth in the top row however, is an upper tooth.  At first I thought perhaps Carchroides catticus, but it is slightly curved (which C. catticus teeth generally are not). and the root intrudes too far down the blade. 

Sorry, now I'm confused. Isn't this the same tooth you thought was a lemon shark earlier in the thread?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...