Jump to content

Fossil “armpit”?


Jemstar

Recommended Posts

image.thumb.jpg.345e7e2e3cfa64588224d3317dd85f84.jpgHi All, this is my first post. I recently found this interesting bit in southern Ontario.  It was in the same river that I find brachiopods and trilobites. 

I couldn’t figure out what it was, but I think I may have now solved it, maybe you can confirm? 
 

I’m affectionately referring to it as an “armpit” of a Bothriolepis. Obviously not an armpit but I think it might be the part where the appendage meets the head shield? My concern is the size of my specimen. The one in the book is only 90mm for the full body. That’s basically the size of my partial specimen.

I’m open to all interpretations, friends. Thanks.

9C21269C-6570-438F-8E35-72EA0ACEF923.jpeg

06BEE90B-557E-4BD2-A09C-0158334541BD.jpeg

6C2EB7D9-4235-4743-8006-DCE2762CAA52.jpeg

98AD6B5D-1458-4F25-8114-06D5BEC9B69E.jpeg

Edited by Jemstar
Added photo from book
  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice find! Definitely fish bone. The tubercules suggest placoderm armor. Do you know what formation this came from? That will probably be necessary to give any more definitive of an ID.

  • I found this Informative 2
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting find!

Certainly looks fishy, but I do not think this is the joint of the flipper, as the parts here look fused. It also doesn't really look like Bothriolepis, especially considering the brachiopods you already posted (I assume those are the ones you are referring to) which are mid Devonian while Bothriolepis is found in the Late Devonian. 

Could this maybe be something like Protitanichthys? I've heard of them being found around there in the Mid Devonian

Edited by Misha
  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, connorp said:

Nice find! Definitely fish bone. The tubercules suggest placoderm armor. Do you know what formation this came from? That will probably be necessary to give any more definitive of an ID.

Thank you, this was in the Arkona formation.

 

48 minutes ago, Misha said:

Very interesting find!

Certainly looks fishy, but I do not think this is the joint of the flipper, as the parts here look fused. It also doesn't really look like Bothriolepis, especially considering the brachiopods you already posted (I assume those are the ones you are referring to) which are mid Devonian while Bothriolepis is found in the Late Devonian. 

Could this maybe be something like Protitanichthys? I've heard of them being found around there in the Mid Devonian

Yes that makes sense, thank you. They are all from the same spot, collected in a river and along the banks.  I will look up Protitanichthys, thanks for the info!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could also be Protitanichthys sp. The piece seems to be from the Widder Fm (judging by the shale).

  • I found this Informative 2

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, mr.cheese said:

Really nice find though I am slightly disappointed that it wasn't the promised fossilised armpit!

Lol I’m so sorry! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Kane said:

It could also be Protitanichthys sp. The piece seems to be from the Widder Fm (judging by the shale).

Thanks for that! I just learned two new things, much appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely placoderm. I think this is part of the thoracic shield, with the pectoral fin sitting within that embayment. That doesn't quite fit morphologically with Protitanichthys, but that may be a consequence of preservation. 

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...