Troodon Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 Interesting paper. Paul Sereno et al. challenge the hypothesis that Spinosaurus was fully aquatic presented in Ibrahim et al. 2020b paper. They also have a different skeletal reconstruction to support their position. https://elifesciences.org/articles/80092 Spinosaurus and Suchomimus Differences between the two skeletal reconstructions 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted November 30, 2022 Author Share Posted November 30, 2022 Tom Holtz posted this about all the social media hype around Spinosaurid T Holts also tweeted it's not an aquatic dinosaur and Dr David Hone responded it never was. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dino Dad 81 Posted December 10, 2022 Share Posted December 10, 2022 https://elifesciences.org/articles/80092 I haven't had a chance to read yet, but I'm curious to see if finding Spinosaurus material in Niger means that Spinosaurus and Suchomimus overlapped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane Posted December 10, 2022 Share Posted December 10, 2022 Topics merged. 1 ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted December 11, 2022 Author Share Posted December 11, 2022 2 hours ago, Dino Dad 81 said: https://elifesciences.org/articles/80092 I haven't had a chance to read yet, but I'm curious to see if finding Spinosaurus material in Niger means that Spinosaurus and Suchomimus overlapped. Suchomimus is in the Elrhaz Fm Albian in age. Teeth found were the northern part of Echkar Fm, Cenomanian in Age . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now