Jump to content

Stumped.... best guess, some sort of conularid, or conularid+stromatoporiod mutualism; Silurian Clinton Group, Blair County PA USA


SteveE

Recommended Posts


From USA, Pennsylvania, Blair County...... Silurian Clinton Group.

 

In profile, this looks conical, with the point down in the sediment rather like a conularid.   But viewed from above, it is ROUND. 

5297C181-C411-4515-A289-680175969B32.thumb.jpeg.37a23198b9c3089b0723dabffbbc434c.jpeg

 

AE9372ED-7A80-4639-9E77-3C67B685E695.thumb.jpeg.01a93907d7c03f18146c468eec2c0fdc.jpeg

 

EB5800ED-9304-4BF4-BF4F-C570EFC98E2A.thumb.jpeg.7c16941bcceb7ee20836327a5e94be91.jpeg

 

 

 

D6B42489-1F8C-425B-9C4F-0F17651F4FFE.thumb.jpeg.97dbcc1aafa34016c67662c3cb60c348.jpeg
 

2D20EBA8-5436-4399-8EBE-49FCBBDA4B5E.thumb.jpeg.e8166276fb43aea8c389bf3936b5fc0e.jpeg

Edited by SteveE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • SteveE changed the title to Stumped.... best guess, some sort of conularid, or conularid+stromatoporiod mutualism; Silurian Clinton Group, Blair County PA USA

If I remember correctly I got sponges from a member here that looked like these. Atleast from the top view.

  • Thank You 1

Dipleurawhisperer5.jpg          MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png

I like Trilo-butts and I cannot lie.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Darktooth said:

If I remember correctly I got sponges from a member here that looked like these. Atleast from the top view.

I have a few stromatoporoids that fit that description, but from an early Devonian formation (Keyser limestone).   The depth of these things in 3d is what really throws a wrench in that ID.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SteveE said:

I have a few stromatoporoids that fit that description, but from an early Devonian formation (Keyser limestone).   The depth of these things in 3d is what really throws a wrench in that ID.

 

Maybe that is what they were labeled as. I think the specimens I am talking about were an auction win from member @Scylla. I will have to see if i can find them. Definitely look the same as yours.

Dipleurawhisperer5.jpg          MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png

I like Trilo-butts and I cannot lie.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Darktooth said:

Maybe that is what they were labeled as....

Probably.  Fossil sponges, so far as I know, all had exoskeletons of (its debated) calcium carbonate and/or aragonite, and were all part of "Stromatoporoidea", which is now extinct.. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2022 at 7:00 PM, SteveE said:

Probably.  Fossil sponges, so far as I know, all had exoskeletons of (its debated) calcium carbonate and/or aragonite, and were all part of "Stromatoporoidea", which is now extinct.. 

Not the glass sponges. I have no idea what these are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2022 at 5:00 PM, SteveE said:

Probably.  Fossil sponges, so far as I know, all had exoskeletons of (its debated) calcium carbonate and/or aragonite, and were all part of "Stromatoporoidea", which is now extinct.. 

 

I assume that this comment was directed toward stromatoporoids specifically and not sponges in general. Stromatoporoids were made of calcium carbonate. 

Edited by DPS Ammonite
  • I Agree 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...