FossilDAWG Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 The other day I bought a set of ammonites from a dealer who was selling off specimens from an old collection. Two of the ammonites were labeled, probably correctly, as the Triassic species Ceratites nodosus and Acanthoceratites spinosus. A third specimen was also labeled as a ceratitid, but it is clearly different. For example the suture line is not at all ceratites-like, and is definitely an ammonite. To my eye several features suggest Placenticeras, a late Cretaceous genus. These include a flat venter with alternating clavi (elongated nodes), nodes at about mid flank, possible faint umbilical nodes, and a very complex suture line. If it is a Placenticeras it doesn't exactly match the species I am familiar with, and the preservation is also unfamilar. Note that there is a lot I don't know about the genus. However it occurs to me that various species of Placenticeras are found in Europe. Of course, it also could be something else entirely. I am asking the community, and especially my fellow ammonite aficionados ( @rocket @Ludwigia @PFOOLEY et al) if they recognize the species and/or the mode of preservation. General aspect: Flank with nodes: Venter showing flat edge with clavi (elongated nodes) on either side: Suture line: I forgot to get a photo of the profile with the aperture, I will add that this evening when I get home. Don 1 Link to post Share on other sites
JohnJ Posted December 13, 2022 Share Posted December 13, 2022 @Heteromorph In the meantime, compare to Placenticeras syrtale as a possibility. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
caterpillar Posted December 13, 2022 Share Posted December 13, 2022 I think that Placenticeras is more oxycone Link to post Share on other sites
Ludwigia Posted December 13, 2022 Share Posted December 13, 2022 I'm afraid that I can't be of much help here since I'm not really up on my cretaceous ammonites, although I can at least definitely confirm that this is not a ceratite. Link to post Share on other sites
rocket Posted December 13, 2022 Share Posted December 13, 2022 great pics, let me take some time in the evening to compare Do not know for 100% now but think I can identify next day Definitely cretaceous, was wrong with my first idea that it´s a jurassic one Link to post Share on other sites
Heteromorph Posted December 13, 2022 Share Posted December 13, 2022 Compare with Placenticeras intercalare. I found a similar (but heavily crushed) ammonite in the late Coniacian of the Austin Chalk (last picture). See also: 1, 2, 3, 4 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites
rocket Posted December 13, 2022 Share Posted December 13, 2022 I would agree to Placenticeras cf. intercalare I am not absolutely sure, but do not know, why. It´s the "nose" we say in Germany. You feel something but cannot justify. Very cool preservation, never seen one in this condition before, and I love cretaceous fossils since decades... 1 Link to post Share on other sites
FossilDAWG Posted December 14, 2022 Author Share Posted December 14, 2022 Thanks all for the suggestions. John, I agree that Placenticeras syrtale is very close. This specimen is a bit more involute than my P. syrtale specimens from Alabama, but they are a little flattened which might distort the umbilicus a bit. Placenticeras intercalare is also close. The illustrations I have found show specimens with the shell, and mine is a steinkern, which complicates comparison. Placenticeras intercalare has more prominent umbilical nodes and stronger ribbing, but that could easily be due to the shell vs internal mould issue. I'll post again when/if I get it figured out. Don 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites
PFOOLEY Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 What a great specimen of Placenticeras, Don...excellent acquisition! Due to the nodes, P. interclare and P. syrtale are good starting points but my S.W.A.G. would be Placenticeras costatum...they too carry similar ornament, but it is not as pronounced. @Foshunter has some great P. syrtale from the Blossom Sand to use as a reference. 4 Link to post Share on other sites
PFOOLEY Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 @FossilDAWG, here are some snapshots for reference... ...from this paper... A survey of the Cretaceous ammonite PlacenticerasMeek, 1876, in the United States Western Interior.pdf ...on Placenticeras from the Western Interior. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
FossilDAWG Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 Thanks Mike. That is quite useful. One potential complication is that the specimen came without provenance (actually, with the wrong label) from an old collection that contained both European and North American fossils. There are some European Placenticeras that are very similar to some North American species such as Placenticeras syrtale, so I have to run down literature on those too. Unfortunately there was a very nice web site on French ammonites that was shut down recently in protest against new French restrictions on collecting. That could have been useful. Don Link to post Share on other sites
Heteromorph Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 On 1/26/2023 at 6:52 PM, FossilDAWG said: Thanks Mike. That is quite useful. One potential complication is that the specimen came without provenance (actually, with the wrong label) from an old collection that contained both European and North American fossils. There are some European Placenticeras that are very similar to some North American species such as Placenticeras syrtale, so I have to run down literature on those too. Unfortunately there was a very nice web site on French ammonites that was shut down recently in protest against new French restrictions on collecting. That could have been useful. Don The French site is still accessible. https://web.archive.org/web/20220523180601/http://www.ammonites.fr/ 2 Link to post Share on other sites
FossilDAWG Posted January 30 Author Share Posted January 30 Thank you so much! That website is a fantastic resource. So much work went into building it. Don 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now