Jump to content

Elrathia Kingii - Real, fake, or another species?


GreatHoatzin

Recommended Posts

I purchased this a long time ago (I cannot remember where) and the seller claimed it was an Elrathia Kingii. As it says on the card, it is apparently “Pre-Cambrian,” although Elrathia kingii originated during the Cambrian. It appears at first glance genuine, but I’d like to be sure.

734388C9-53F1-43A8-8E81-1517C82699B7.jpeg

41DD20B9-B7BB-471D-8AA5-2B34512CA935.jpeg

EB65F4CF-48E3-44F2-9EB1-505BC30223ED.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely real. Very common, and no reason to fake them.

  • Enjoyed 1
  • I Agree 3

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fossildude19 said:

Completely real. Very common, and no reason to fake them.

Alright, thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it's real.

And you are quire correct; Elrathia kingii is a Middle Cambrian species. 

Quite a nice one, too.:trilo:

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Thank You 1

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gunther & Gunther (1981) claim in their paper Some Middle Cambrian Fossils of Utah that up to 1.5 million samples had been discovered over the previous 20 years, so you can well imagine that there's no reason to fake these things. It is the most common of all trilobites in the USA. Although it can only be found at a few selected sites in Utah, one can find up to 500 samples within one square meter. The "Pre-Cambrian" on the card is incorrect and you are correct in stating that it is of Cambrian age.

  • I found this Informative 3

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...