Jump to content

Possible Dino footprint found in overburden pile on private land with permission


Narbuff

Recommended Posts

This was found on private land in western MA in the Connecticut River valley. There is 1 clear 'footprint', a possible tail drag, and the imprint of another possible footprint behind it.

 

Any advice, thoughts, or identifications are welcome. Thank you!

20230119_140324.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can you show us a photo with the light at a low angle?  By this, I mean shining the light almost parallel to the surface.  This way the three dimensional aspects are much easier to see.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure! I did my best, I hope this helps. Happy to take more photos too if these don't work.

459927985_20230119_150700(1).jpg

20230119_151150.jpg

20230119_151216.jpg

20230119_151335.jpg

20230119_151329.jpg

20230119_150700.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, not really seeing a footprint here.  :shrug:

  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I do sometimes is a rubbing like a rubbing of a gravestone. Sometimes I get a kinda 3 dimensional effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way this could be some sort of small or juvenile sauropodomorph (footprint in attached figure) right?

 

@Troodon, I could also see it resembling G in the figure you shared.

 

I've also attached 2 pictures showing different orientations/perspectives of this piece. 

 

The preserved surface of this slab seems to be muddy river bed, and this indentation (to my admittedly novice eyes) looks like it isn't random...but I admit I might be reaching here.

 

Thank you everyone for your input!

f06_291 (1).jpg

20221121_083840.jpg

476793973_20221205_153145(1).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe so.  :(

 

This picture kind of tells the story for me.

 

No real individual toe impressions. Looks more like sedimentary structures to me.

Too amorphous looking .

 

20230119_151216.jpg.38224a85276b55d3e335c8cbf13f0dcd.jpg

  • I Agree 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Narbuff,

I am no expert, much less so than the others who have stated their opinion here. 

Thats a piece I would definitely keep, and I think its close enough to contact the author mentioned above. Maybe its an incomplete or distorted footprint, maybe its pure coincidence, and probably you will never know for sure, which is often the case with single tentative prints. But I definitely see what caught your eye.

Best Regards,

J

Try to learn something about everything and everything about something

Thomas Henry Huxley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...