Jump to content

Opal lungfish tooth plate


Vopros

Recommended Posts

The seller did not realize what it was and split it in 4 pieces. What a pity! 

Here it is 

 

 

Edited by Vopros
  • Enjoyed 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A few days ago I posted on this forum the same fossil but back then I thought it was a bone.

Now I know it is a lungfish tooth plate. 
It was broken into four pieces by a miner. 

Here are two images of the front and back of the specimen ( hat I tried to reassemble) and two more show how it looks under a microscope.

A paleontologist told me it is incomplete.

However, except the broken sides I do not see any other edges that appear to be broken.

It appears to be a complete specimen.

What do you think? If it is incomplete on what sides you believe the parts are missing?

Thanks!

 

82169805-9E84-4BD3-A492-4DE48A3C7605.jpeg

E9C3C409-041A-4C0A-A0F9-FBFF02424CCE.jpeg

08B84A2D-0C06-4933-AE0E-9E9EFEFCCBBD.jpeg

C21147A8-8A54-4BA8-9131-9343CE7D5AE5.jpeg

  • Enjoyed 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantastic, it's a partial plate.  Attached find a paper on these tooth plates that shows you what complete ones look like from different species.  Authored by Kemp, University of Queensland

Lungfish.pdf

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comments about the same fossil are generally kept in one topic.  (Topics have been merged.) ;)

  • Thank You 1

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Troodon said:

Fantastic, it's a partial plate.  Attached find a paper on these tooth plates that shows you what complete ones look like from different species.  Authored by Kemp, University of Queensland

Lungfish.pdf 1.83 MB · 5 downloads

Thank you!

However as I said there are no broken edges and it appears the specimen is complete.

So I wonder, if it is possible that the fish had some deformity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a beautiful fossil!

The round side, pointing down in your first pic, looks like a smoothed break  to me.

Is that video made by you? Moving the opal in relation to the camera will show the colours much better than moving the lightsource, when you move the light the same colours go on and off, when moving the opal, they can change.

Still a marvel to look at!

Try to learn something about everything and everything about something

Thomas Henry Huxley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a broken edge that is water worn, looks smooth and supports what was said by a paleontologist.

It's still a super fossil

1675685305412.jpg.fc13b8e1920e78bc45a6d9139a184824.jpg

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, everybody!

I filmed the edges here 

 

All broken edges have a match with other edges. They also have the bars.

All other edges appear to be smooth. They have no bars.

 

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...