Jump to content

Fossils from the middle and upper Santonian of Gelsenkirchen / NW-Germany


rocket

Recommended Posts

In 1995 (long ago...) a friend of mine and me digged at a highway-constructionsite in nw-germany. It was the Highway Nr. 2 between Gelsenkirchen and Gladbeck in famous Ruhrgebiet-Area. The construction site opens at a lenght of 3 km sandy sediments from middle Santonian, Zone of Uintacrinus socialis. We really found a lot..., beach sediments with everything from plants over echinoderms up to vertebrate fossils (some lang-living ones...), and stored it. Till now. Some weeks ago I started to clean, glue, sort..., to write a paper about it. Hope to finish in 2025, lot of work... I go to show piece by piece fossils from this site, might be one a day, might be one a week. depends.

Start is a nice Cretalamna appendiculata, approx. 2 cm long, root is a little bit damaged.

1135_Zahn_GE.thumb.jpg.d5ca09abd2514841e0c7d3649cd435f0.jpg1137_Zahn_GE.thumb.jpg.70adf8718cc7c685532a3104d41fe275.jpg

  • I found this Informative 3
  • Enjoyed 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

small snail, no name for the moment. Not unusual to find snails there but this has mother of pearl on it. The only one I ever found there

 

 

1103.JPG

  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 pics of some limpets, Brunonia cf. irregularis, fine preservation with brown shell, unusual. But this site had many unusual fossils and preservations

All are small ones, maximum size was 15 mm, this has 13 mm. Just in prep, fraaaaaagile....

 

DSC_0098.thumb.JPG.d39ad86c213f96ce2bf7de82e8d4ebc2.JPGDSC_0100.thumb.JPG.d3d982d1b8c1b4349c3e55399ac147c6.JPGDSC_0099.thumb.JPG.ccf69d5625f61a50e59b23b035d90327.JPG

 

  • Enjoyed 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, rocket said:

3 pics of some limpets, Brunonia cf. irregularis, fine preservation with brown shell, unusual.


Could this be a brachiopod? Looks similar to Discinisca, which would explain the brown phosphatic shell.

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Al Dente said:


Could this be a brachiopod? Looks similar to Discinisca, which would explain the brown phosphatic shell.

 

this is what I thought first in the 90th, but the result was "Snail". Unusual preservation, in deed. Its the only snail in this preservation from this site, everything else is without shell. But, will be prooved again next time, will send one to a specialist for this snails (if it is)

Edited by rocket
Link to comment
Share on other sites

in a sandy layer (base of upper middle santonian) snails are "phosphatic". Its a special way of preservation we have in some sediments in warm and not deep water-sediments

 

IMG_4705.thumb.JPG.c7fbe0f900133cde94704bcb45fec492.JPGIMG_4729.thumb.JPG.fa046b8b08a46d0431f50b544c0a2d8b.JPG

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

and, after a full box of snails, one with parts of Ammonites. Preservation is unique, all incomplete, only chambers, 95% Baculites, all small (max size 2 cm)

 

 

IMG_4726.JPG

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so, before this thread goes forgotten, some new material

Belemnites had not been rare and good indicators for the stratigraphic position. We found Gonioteuthis granulata (approx. 50 ones between 3 and 7 cm) and some not identified ones (a dozen). Another, more rare Belemnite was Actinocamax verus. This is a small belemnit, maximum was 50 mm.

When I go on preparing the paper I will do new pics. Hope this (mediumbad ones) will give you an impression about.

Gonioteuthis.thumb.JPG.0c926dfa8de4682e88b3652d5a8ade04.JPG

 

Actinocamax.JPG

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

bottom layer was grey "Emschermergel", soft sandy and marly sediment. Locally full of fossils, normally marine invertebrates.

Rare are angiosperm plant remains, this is an undetermined leaf (could be a Lauraceae, but...)

approx. 7 cm long

 

 

IMG_3186.JPG

  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to see another Santonian site to compare with my local stuff.

I was not aware of any occurrences of Uintacrinus outside of North America until yours. Do you have pics of them?

Also, I thought Uintacrinus was an Upper Santonian index fossil (but then I'm not sure if it is divided into Lower/Middle/Upper or just Lower/Upper).

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Wrangellian said:

Nice to see another Santonian site to compare with my local stuff.

I was not aware of any occurrences of Uintacrinus outside of North America until yours. Do you have pics of them?

Also, I thought Uintacrinus was an Upper Santonian index fossil (but then I'm not sure if it is divided into Lower/Middle/Upper or just Lower/Upper).

 

Uintacrinus socials occurs at many places in Europa. The british Uintacrinus are popular and some sites in germany gave to opportunity to find some. Normally totally discarticulated, but sometimes it was possible to find half complete ones. Normally you find them only in a small layer (approx. 2 - 3 feet) at the base of the upper Santonian. But, in Gelsenkirchen we found isolated elements in the upper middle Santonian. Not many, but it seems that Uintacrinus occurs from middle santonian up to middle upper. Not easy to decide.

I add some pics of isolated elements and a nice half-complete one from Münsterland basin (not in my collection :s_cry:)

 

 

 

IMG_4670.JPG

IMG_1451b.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, rocket said:

nice ones from Great Britain are shown at this wonderful website:

Uintacrinus (discoveringfossils.co.uk)

Thanks... It makes sense that it has a broad distribution as it was not tied down to anything like stalked crinoids were. I know Marsupties is worldwide.

It's also interesting that you can narrow them down to thin layers. Over here the layers are not easy to distinguish - it's all deep Haslam shale, largely undifferentiated - and you have to go by what fossils you are finding to know what zone or stage you're in.

Edited by Wrangellian
clarification
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Wrangellian said:

Thanks... It makes sense that it has a broad distribution as it was not tied down to anything like stalked crinoids were. I know Marsupties is worldwide.

It's also interesting that you can narrow them down to thin layers. Over here the layers are not easy to distinguish - it's all Haslam shale - and you have to go by what fossils you are finding know what zone or stage you're in.

we had been always a bit curios about the distribution. Base of the upper Santonian was a hardground. Lot of burials in it, so we had always been unsure if the Uintas really come from the top or if the are part of deep burrows. My opinion is, that they occure in top of middle Santonian, not at the base of upper. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • digit changed the title to Fossils from the middle and upper Santonian of Gelsenkirchen / NW-Germany
11 hours ago, rocket said:

As I post it piece by piece and there are many pieces..., @Wrangellian: if you love to see something with priority from this site to compare with your material, let me know. 

I'll wait to see what you have... so far there is not much similarity besides the Uintacrinus. Different preservation, I guess - our Haslam Fm is dark shale (deeper than yours apparently). We do have some plant material including similar leaves. Do you see any Glyptostrobus or other conifers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Wrangellian said:

We do have some plant material including similar leaves. Do you see any Glyptostrobus or other conifers?

Some indetermined conifers, think it will be Geinitzia

I add a bad pic and do better ones next days. Many years ago we wrote a small paper about this taxon from upper santonian, was 2001. I check if I have a pdf of it, otherwise I can do a copy

 

IMG_4386.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rocket said:

Some indetermined conifers, think it will be Geinitzia

I add a bad pic and do better ones next days. Many years ago we wrote a small paper about this taxon from upper santonian, was 2001. I check if I have a pdf of it, otherwise I can do a copy

Thanks, but don't worry about it unless you have it handy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

small news, too much to do, not enough coffee :coffee:, but finished two more fossils from this fantastic site

Both preserved in "Nodules", one is a Nautiloide (Eutrephoceras sp.), the other one is a shell on the nodule. This is full of small fossils, mostly bryozoans, serpulids, shells and plant remains

 

 

IMG_1608.JPG

IMG_1611.JPG

IMG_1612.JPG

IMG_1606.JPG

IMG_1607.JPG

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can feel your pain("not enough coffee"):ninja:

Edited by doushantuo

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, doushantuo said:

I can feel your pain("not enough coffee"):ninja:

 

hard times we live in 

327308481_1449502242242925_5239567850937200178_n.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...