Jump to content

Sponge, skin or what?


Chris. D. Wright

Recommended Posts

Found on Pakefield beach Suffolk UK. Any ideas as to what it could be please.20230319_134604.thumb.jpg.8ad92f63fc847866ccfbc7dd0bec8fad.jpg

20230319_134914.jpg

20230319_134737.jpg

20230319_132516.jpg

  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears to match within the Cretaceous Ventriculitidae. Perhaps @TqB  Tarquin can assist further with a specific ID. mail?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.yimg.com%2Fok%2Fu%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Femoticons%2Femo71.gif&t=1679248250&ymreqid=23281213-8dc1-3cff-1ccc-6c0005014800&sig=FaZILlghNj7jCCLOCCb3Cw--~D

 

image.thumb.png.9111ce4efe9fa6348b72f5f451f9742c.png

 

Smith, J.T. 1847

On the Ventriculidae of the Chalk; Including the Description of Peculiar Characters of Structure Observed in their Tissues.

Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 20(131):73-97  PDF LINK

  • I found this Informative 2
  • I Agree 1

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, piranha said:

It appears to match within the Cretaceous Ventriculitidae. Perhaps @TqB  Tarquin can assist further with a specific ID. mail?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.yimg.com%2Fok%2Fu%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Femoticons%2Femo71.gif&t=1679248250&ymreqid=23281213-8dc1-3cff-1ccc-6c0005014800&sig=FaZILlghNj7jCCLOCCb3Cw--~D

 

I don't recognize it I'm afraid (I only dabble in these!). It is a beautiful specimen and I don't think it's one of the common ones. 
It does look a reasonable match for the second plate fig. 3 but I'm not sure that one's still still regarded as ventriculitid and I can't see the name in the pdf - perhaps it's in the "to be continued" section. :)

  • I Agree 1

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TqB said:

I don't recognize it I'm afraid (I only dabble in these!). It is a beautiful specimen and I don't think it's one of the common ones. 
It does look a reasonable match for the second plate fig. 3 but I'm not sure that one's still still regarded as ventriculitid and I can't see the name in the pdf - perhaps it's in the "to be continued" section. :)

 

 

As you suggested, the plate descriptions appear in a subsequent section. happy0144.gif


Fig. 3: Ventriculites impressus. This is a description update of Smith 1847-48.

 

image.thumb.png.e859593eeff95d786a56c8a962b680ad.png

 

Hinde, GJ. 1883.

Catalogue of the Fossil Sponges in the Geological
Department of the British Museum (Natural History).

Taylor & Francis: London, pp: 1-248, plts: I-XXXVIII

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Thank You 1

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, piranha said:

 

 

As you suggested, the plate descriptions appear in a subsequent section. happy0144.gif


Fig. 3: Ventriculites impressus. This is a description update of Smith 1847-48.

 

Hinde, GJ. 1883.

Catalogue of the Fossil Sponges in the Geological
Department of the British Museum (Natural History).

Taylor & Francis: London, pp: 1-248, plts: I-XXXVIII

 

Thank you! (The Hinde Catalogue is still a very valuable reference. I treasure my original copy with it's beautiful plates. :) ) 

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...