Jump to content

HMBfossils

Recommended Posts

It doesn't look like a tooth of any kind to me. The photos of the ends seem to be out of focus. A better look at them might help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much better. I think this probably is a tusk of some sort. Just a guess, but I wonder if it could be from something like a walrus. 

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the photo you want to show,  then no one will mistake it for a rock.... Likely Walrus

walrusmaybe.JPG.5a2e3dc351d146db580a3d45f880fa7d.JPG

  • I found this Informative 2

The White Queen  ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all.  Do you  think it's a fossil though?  We don't have walruses in California unless you're at the zoo...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, HMBfossils said:

Thanks all.  Do you  think it's a fossil though?  We don't have walruses in California unless you're at the zoo...

Where did you find it exactly? I'm assuming California, but besides that was it at the beach, a creek, in the mountains, etc.?

Locality gives a lot of information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, I think we literally have a bone yard off my beach in Half Moon Bay, CA (not a state beach).  So far you guys have identified my mammoth leg, prehistoric horse teeth, and now this tusk in like 2 months (not to mention all the shell fossils from the purrisma foundation which you can see in the surf where I found the bones).   I know the recent atmospheric rivers and crazy tides have washed a lot of stuff down.  A few people i know have found skulls and other stuff.  I just go out every day with my dog looking for sea glass but keep tripping over bones.  Would love to show any of y'all where I find them and participate in any excavations!!!  My sea glass friends and I would really enjoy the experience showing our sites to experts and learning from you....

 

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was found high tide line at the base of the purissima formation near a cliff where I found the prehistoric horse teeth in the cliff itself.  No nearby creeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jikohr said:

Where did you find it exactly? I'm assuming California, but besides that was it at the beach, a creek, in the mountains, etc.?

Locality gives a lot of information.

 

27 minutes ago, HMBfossils said:

Guys, I think we literally have a bone yard off my beach in Half Moon Bay, CA (not a state beach).  So far you guys have identified my mammoth leg, prehistoric horse teeth, and now this tusk in like 2 months (not to mention all the shell fossils from the purrisma foundation which you can see in the surf where I found the bones).   I know the recent atmospheric rivers and crazy tides have washed a lot of stuff down.  A few people i know have found skulls and other stuff.  I just go out every day with my dog looking for sea glass but keep tripping over bones.  Would love to show any of y'all where I find them and participate in any excavations!!!  My sea glass friends and I would really enjoy the experience showing our sites to experts and learning from you....

 

 

For future reference, "exact" locations are not really needed.  We usually do pretty well with regional proximity.  San Mateo County would probably be specific enough.  ;) 

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Samantha used to say: "Calling Dr. Boessenecker, calling Dr.Boessenecker. Emergency! Come right away!" @Boesse

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

at first I thought fragmetn of walrus tusk, but one thing makes me wonder: 

in the closeup-cross section pic it looks as if the section was quite narrow to begin with, not circular as I would expect of a modern walrus tusk. Interesting piece of tooth/tusk in my eyes.

Sounds like an interesting place.

Best Regards,

J

Try to learn something about everything and everything about something

Thomas Henry Huxley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mahnmut said:

at first I thought fragmetn of walrus tusk, but one thing makes me wonder: 

in the closeup-cross section pic it looks as if the section was quite narrow to begin with, not circular as I would expect of a modern walrus tusk

I think erosion has masked the amount of material that has been broken away. It may have lost a fair sized flake. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might want to read this post... some similarities..

 

  • I Agree 2

The White Queen  ".... in her youth she could believe "six impossible things before breakfast"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats the part of the cross-section that makes me think this tooth was not zylindrical like a walrus tooth to begin with...

walrusmaybe.JPG.5a2e3dc351d146db580a3d45f880fa7d1.JPG

Try to learn something about everything and everything about something

Thomas Henry Huxley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rockwood said:

But this looks broken to me.

 

Agreed, I just say that I think the cross-section looks as if it was rather oblong even before it broke. Thus the thread linked by Shellseeker looks like a hot lead to me. My bet is on sirenian rather than walrus, dont know about other fossil pinnipeds, or something else even more exotic,  like beaked whale(?), but I do not think so. Just speculating about an eroded fragment.

Best Regards as always

J

  • I Agree 2

Try to learn something about everything and everything about something

Thomas Henry Huxley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2023 at 2:32 AM, Mahnmut said:

Hi,

at first I thought fragmetn of walrus tusk, but one thing makes me wonder: 

in the closeup-cross section pic it looks as if the section was quite narrow to begin with, not circular as I would expect of a modern walrus tusk. Interesting piece of tooth/tusk in my eyes.

Sounds like an interesting place.

Best Regards,

J

I just found some time to look into the circular section concept. My photos from the Maine state museum, along with a number of photos online seem to show a considerable amount of variation from circular aspect. Some look down right convoluted at the proximal end. I seriously doubt that this could from a dugong. The texture looks quite different to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey all,

 

Some of the finds being made recently with all this rain are late Pleistocene in age, for example someone else found a mammoth astragalus back in December or January. This specimen is not from the Purisima Formation: bones and teeth from that unit are generally dark brown or black, and in Half Moon Bay, do not weather out 1) cleanly from the matrix or 2) in complete pieces, owing to extensive fracturing. I think it is fair to assume this specimen is from late Pleistocene deposits.

 

Sirenian: only the earliest known sirenians from the west coast retained tusks, and there's just a handful of them - Dioplotherium allisoni, which is early or middle Miocene.

 

As for walrus: it's too narrow from side to side, it seems.

 

I'm not sure what this thing is.

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...