Jump to content

Pisco Formation Carcharhinus teeth


fossilsonwheels

Recommended Posts

I’m starting to work on the Carcharhinus and related shark displays. I’ve got three teeth from the Pisco Formation, Sacaco location that I can’t quite nail down as far as ID. I know they could end up being Carcharhinus sp but I thought I’d give an ID post a chance. I’m not really confident in my ability to ID the gray sharks. 
 

The first two look like they might be C. obscurus to me but I know there would be other possibilities. They are both right around 13mm on the slant so not very large. The first one is in better shape, the second is pretty worn. 
 

The third tooth is actually a really cool looking tooth. It’s about 10mm on the slant and 14mm wide. This one has me pretty stumped. Could be a C. brachyurus but none of the teeth in my collection match it enough for me to be sure. 

A1BC3203-04A8-4346-88CF-8A45A568C62D.jpeg

4478FFA9-044A-4F08-9B5E-BB2393D4E690.jpeg

54906B37-B9F4-4A40-BDDB-C872379572DA.jpeg

419DA180-CB69-41D2-AABD-71CBD5E74CA9.jpeg

D98173BA-7874-4FBF-80A2-631F1E25EA21.jpeg

3A6FE0FE-9CD4-4D4B-A4F0-728456CEAE7B.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first is a good match to dusky, the second is a bit worn but dusky isn't a bad guess for that one too.

 

Obscurus.thumb.jpg.547dffab21ef85424caff5e7a1e20cac.jpg

 

I'm not so confident on the third, C. brachyurus seems like a decent guess.

 

image.thumb.png.bbe41045ddb4287cfcd7328976287cd1.png

http://naka.na.coocan.jp/JAWCarcharhinidae.html

 

 

Edited by ThePhysicist
  • Thank You 1
  • I Agree 1

"Argumentation cannot suffice for the discovery of new work, since the subtlety of Nature is greater many times than the subtlety of argument." - Carl Sagan

"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." - Richard Feynman

 

Collections: Hell Creek Microsite | Hell Creek/Lance | Dinosaurs | Sharks | SquamatesPost Oak Creek | North Sulphur RiverLee Creek | Aguja | Permian | Devonian | Triassic | Harding Sandstone

Instagram: @thephysicist_tff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ThePhysicist said:

The first is a good match to dusky, the second is a bit worn but dusky isn't a bad guess for that one too.

 

Obscurus.thumb.jpg.547dffab21ef85424caff5e7a1e20cac.jpg

 

I'm not so confident on the third, C. brachyurus seems like a decent guess.

 

image.thumb.png.bbe41045ddb4287cfcd7328976287cd1.png

http://naka.na.coocan.jp/JAWCarcharhinidae.html

 

 

Thanks for the information and help ! I used the dentions on Naka and didn’t see anything that was a better fit for the third one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...