Jump to content

Virus-infecting Virus Fuels Definition Of Life Debate


Guest Nicholas

Recommended Posts

Guest Nicholas

Not Fossil Related... but interesting.

National Geographic: "The discovery of a massive virus that suffers from another virus has reignited debate over whether the microscopic agents of infection should be considered living things rather than bags of genes."

Find the link HERE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All in the definition, which is a human construct. How we classify them doesn't cahnge what they are, nor alter our understanding. Might as well decide that eukaryotes are merely a terribly complicated system for the making of more viruses.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest solius symbiosus

^^Except that eukaryotic life can self-replicate; viruses can not. I thought that was the fundamental definition of life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^Except that eukaryotic life can self-replicate; viruses can not. I thought that was the fundamental definition of life.

Exactly; by definition, viruses are not alive. That they require self-replicating organisms (living things) to produce more of them is rather a nasty twist. From a virus' perspective (not to imply sentience), living cells are the mechanism of their immortality; they are not alive, yet they have a seat at the table of the living. (Let's not even mention prions!)

Beyond all my philosophical gibberish, my point is that shifting the parameters of definition does not change that which is redefined, nor (in the case of viruses) does it change our understanding of them.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I'm not nearly smart enough to debate anything with ya'll, but I'm just wondering - does the fact that I have to eat formerly living stuff to stay alive myself mean that I'm a virus? I mean, I can't replicate without sustenance, so I'm not exactly independent. I'm just curious, mainly because I'm gonna switch sides on wanting them to find cures for everything if I discover than I'm a virus myself...

P.S. - The only reason I can philosophize at the moment is because I just had a piece of cherry pie and a Samuel Adams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're safe; viruses don't eat. All they do is hijack living cells into making more viruses.

Yeast, on the other hand, eats sugar and poops alcohol, bringing us the gift of Sam Adams. :D

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Nicholas
Yeast, on the other hand, eats sugar and poops alcohol, bringing us the gift of Sam Adams. :D

LOL! Sounds like a red neck bed time story for kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...