mikecable Posted March 17, 2013 Author Share Posted March 17, 2013 Admiral Formation--Permian--Lawton, OK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missourian Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Microscopes open up a whole new world. Context is critical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecable Posted April 2, 2013 Author Share Posted April 2, 2013 As a teacher, I was lucky to receive about four gallons of matrix from the PCS phosphate mine in Aurora, NC. And of course, as a teacher, I had to see what the material held before I turned my students loose on it. Don't worry--I'm not depriving them. I took out about a pint of material and haven't even begun to finish going through it yet. To give an idea of scale, here is the material I photographed in a 100 mm petri dish. Some bivalves and a gastropod. A neat little vertebra that would benefit from photo stacking. A shark tooth, fish tooth and fin spine? Naturally occurring asbestos crystals? And my favorite--a stingray barb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecable Posted April 3, 2013 Author Share Posted April 3, 2013 The Seben camera mount can be a persnickety beast. You have to wiggle and jiggle and adjust and readjust to get the field of view just right. And then it has a tendency to drift. I'm not unhappy with it--I can now get decent pictures through my scope. But yesterday evening everything just seemed to fall into place easily--and didn't drift out of place. A few more pics of Aurora PCS mine material. For scale--100 mm petri dish. Some nice wee beasties. And my favorite. Smalltoothed Sand Tiger Shark? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecable Posted April 4, 2013 Author Share Posted April 4, 2013 Tonight's experiment was to try and work on a smaller level. Smaller specimens, higher magnification--trying to capture detail in terms of microns rather than millimeters. I'm learning something about my tools. I mentioned this morning that I had better control of the Seben camera mount. I'm using a binocular microscope head, and not a trinocular head that has a vertical eyepiece. Since the eyepiece I'm using to mount the camera mount is inclined, and I'm using a fairly heavy camera, I found that gravity is my enemy. If I tilt the entire mount slightly away from myself, and more toward the vertical, before I tighten everything down, gravity works for me. Now for the pics. Again, this is PCS Aurora mine material from NC. This bit is somewhere between 500 and 1000 microns in diameter. As you can see, it's ruler straight with a very slight taper. Echinoid spine? It's not really clear from the photo, which is not B & W, but full color--this is comprised of what appears to be black phosphate. Second specimen-- Again, somewhere between 500 and 1000 microns in diameter. Slightly curved, but no taper. This specimen appears to be silicate--slightly translucent. I want to try later to document this with some dark field or sub-stage lighting. I welcome ID comments, or comments on how I might improve the photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missourian Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Nice images.... and don't be afraid to post BIGGER ones. Context is critical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecable Posted April 4, 2013 Author Share Posted April 4, 2013 Nice images.... and don't be afraid to post BIGGER ones. Everything I post is big. Just a matter of perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Hi, I think they could be fossorial sea urchin spines (who lives in the mud). Coco ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecable Posted April 4, 2013 Author Share Posted April 4, 2013 Hi, I think they could be fossorial sea urchin spines (who lives in the mud). Coco I think you're right. Unless somebody offers another suggestion I'm going with echinoid spines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now