Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
araucaria1959

Dinosaur Claw, Cretaceous, Taouz / Marocco

Recommended Posts

araucaria1959    11
araucaria1959

Hello,

this is a small dinosaur claw (length about 18 mm; scale = mm).

All I know is that it's from Taouz, so I suppose it is from the Kem Kem Beds.

A currently published faunal list of the Kem Kem Beds encompasses the following theropod taxa:

Spinosaurus cf. aegypticus, Carcharodontosaurus saharicus, cf. Majungasaurus, Deltadromaeus agilis, Dromaeosauridae indet.

Is it possible to ID the specimen?

Thanks

araucaria1959

claw - 1.bmp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
araucaria1959    11
araucaria1959

A second picture of the same claw:

claw-2.bmp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Regg Cato    15
Regg Cato

Seems to fall within normal range of variation for Spinosaurus, though it's not complete and missing the proximal end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Troodon    2,858
Troodon

There is very little published information on theropod material from Morocco to help ID claws. Without the proximal end of the claw it would be a guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Regg Cato    15
Regg Cato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mike from North Queensland    103
Mike from North Queensland

Not meaning to put a damper on things but the texture does not look like bone.

Also note that I no nothing about what fossils from Kem Kem look like.

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Troodon    2,858
Troodon

I can say that with the Kem Kem claws I have in my collection it looks okay. Again, I would caution against trying to put an ID without a complete claw and it being so small. I do not think its Spino since I own both a adult and and juvenile specimen. You are looking at some small probably unidescribed theropod.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
araucaria1959    11
araucaria1959

Thank you very much. I was surprised (and shocked) indeed when I saw my pictures enlarged because that was the first time I realized the unusual coarse-grained texture so that I considered the possibility that this could be a fake. That's the reason why I didn't downsize the pics, so that this texture remained visible.

So I'm glad that Troodon says it looks okay, even if ID is impossible.

araucaria1959

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mike from North Queensland    103
Mike from North Queensland

Good to hear its normal for the region as the coarse grain is something I have not seen in fossils before. We are all learning. :)

Mike

Edited by Mike from North Queensland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×