docdutronc Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 lepidodendron leaves are more short than sigillariaphylloides ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mommabetts Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Would these be leaves, or leaflets? My assumption is that they are compound. "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docdutronc Posted November 22, 2008 Author Share Posted November 22, 2008 Would these be leaves, or leaflets? My assumption is that they are compound. Hi Auspex Most of these leaves are counpound ,the autors described the lepidodendron branches whith leaflets ,the common name is "leaf" like Conifera ,very difficult to find a good sample .....,look this sigillariaphylloides !!!!!! Bruno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docdutronc Posted November 29, 2008 Author Share Posted November 29, 2008 Hi Auspex Most of these leaves are counpound ,the autors described the lepidodendron branches whith leaflets ,the common name is "leaf" like Conifera ,very difficult to find a good sample .....,look this sigillariaphylloides !!!!!! Bruno Here is a Lepidophloios with leaves attached ,they are erected and fine .....,this sample comes from a pit near Dourges (Pas de calais ) France and has been founded by my better friend Hervé Dusquesne.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Daniel AKA (Bones) Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 lepidodendron leaves are more short than sigillariaphylloides ..... Hi Doc, Here are a couple of pictures of the first fossil I ever pound. Lepidodendron I was nine years old with my parents on vacation at Robbers Cave state park in Oklahoma. It is not very fancy, however it takes a prominent place in one of my fossil cabinets becuase it was the first. Thought someone might like to know about this location. It was about 10 miles east of the park. It looked like a forest fallen down in the woods there was so much material. I took buckets of it home. Sigilaria as well. v = 0.25 * g0.5 * SL1.67 * h-1.17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docdutronc Posted November 29, 2008 Author Share Posted November 29, 2008 Hi Doc,Here are a couple of pictures of the first fossil I ever pound. Lepidodendron I was nine years old with my parents on vacation at Robbers Cave state park in Oklahoma. It is not very fancy, however it takes a prominent place in one of my fossil cabinets becuase it was the first. Thought someone might like to know about this location. It was about 10 miles east of the park. It looked like a forest fallen down in the woods there was so much material. I took buckets of it home. Sigilaria as well. Hi D D Aka In reality this is a root ,lepidodendron roots ,the name is Stigmaria ficoides .... best regards bruno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Daniel AKA (Bones) Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 Hi D D Aka In reality this is a root ,lepidodendron roots ,the name is Stigmaria ficoides .... best regards bruno If it doesn't have a backbone, I don't know much about it. Thats why they call me Bones instead of Roots. v = 0.25 * g0.5 * SL1.67 * h-1.17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now