Jump to content

Bryozoa Or Coral?


Spookwoman

Recommended Posts

This found on the "heavy rock" after soaking. Its 7mm long and less than 1mm wide. Looks Bryozoan to me and possibly Crustopora I think. Any ID would be great. Area is ordovician.

post-14568-0-49065200-1396795012_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be a small branch of a Polypora Bryozoa. It's hard to tell with it's size.

~Charlie~

"There are those that look at things the way they are, and ask why.....i dream of things that never were, and ask why not?" ~RFK
->Get your Mosasaur print
->How to spot a fake Trilobite
->How to identify a CONCRETION from a DINOSAUR EGG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tiny is the word. Can say though there is nothing broken off the sides likes branches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say bryozoa also.

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen

No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go.

" I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes

"can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe nautiloids started developing into the spiral we know during the ordovician but it not till early devonian that they evolved fully and by late devonian they were everywhere.

Thanks for the coral or bryozoa, it's a pity there is no complete all in 1 place to get an id on them. Left it soaking over night and more details showing can be viewed as large http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php?/gallery/image/32249-heavy-rock-with-coral-shells-etc-possible-polypora-bryozoa-image-updated-after-soaking/

Edited by Spookwoman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

guess its just matrixing you know now that i relook at it it does and doersnt look like an ammonoid lol just....shiny:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were some in the upper Ordo, no?

The earliest ammonites were in the Devonian

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen

No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go.

" I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes

"can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The earliest ammonites were in the Devonian

As I understand it, true ammonites appeared in the latest Triassic - everything before that was an ammonoid (or nautiloid). Just splitting hairs, but only because of the hair-splitting between coiled nautiloid and ammonoid!

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...