Shaunjones72 Posted July 22, 2014 Share Posted July 22, 2014 (edited) Fossils found in sandstone/mudstone(?) in North Wales, near a man-made reservoir called Llyn Brenig, in an upland area called Mynydd Hiraethog, sometimes known as Denbigh Moors. The area's geology "...consists predominantly of Silurian sedimentary shales, mudstones, and siltstones of Wenlock and Ludlow age" (1994 British Geological Survey). The exposed cross-sections are up to 10mm in diameter. A close look at the side of the rock shows that some of the fossils appear to reach most of the way through the rock, roughly 8-10cm. The internal structure is intricate. I found a second rock containing similar fossils, but their shape is less obvious. Any ideas? Edited July 22, 2014 by Shaunjones72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted July 22, 2014 Share Posted July 22, 2014 I'd wager on colonial coral, but cannot suggest a more specific ID. "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanNREMTP Posted July 22, 2014 Share Posted July 22, 2014 I too agree on colonial coral from what I can make out in the picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted July 22, 2014 Share Posted July 22, 2014 It's a good specimen of a Lower Carboniferous rugose coral, Siphonodendron sp. These are widely distributed as glacial erratics - there are source rocks in North Wales and further afield. 1 Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digit Posted July 22, 2014 Share Posted July 22, 2014 (edited) Given what appear to be radial septal lines and possibly a columella in the center, I'd be inclined to agree with the general diagnosis of coral but I'd have no clue more specific than that. Cool rock--would look pretty cool tumbled and polished. Cheers. -Ken Edit: See, there are such great experts on this forum in all kinds of fossil types and TqB provided a great response while I was typing my post. Edited July 22, 2014 by digit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaunjones72 Posted July 22, 2014 Author Share Posted July 22, 2014 Thank you all! Very impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LanceH Posted July 22, 2014 Share Posted July 22, 2014 Have it polished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted July 22, 2014 Share Posted July 22, 2014 I agree with Tarquin. Siphonodendron and a good specimen at that. Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herb Posted July 22, 2014 Share Posted July 22, 2014 nice coral "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go. " I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes "can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaunjones72 Posted July 23, 2014 Author Share Posted July 23, 2014 Thank you all sincerely. Was kiboshed by the 2MB limit for images, as I have much sharper images too large to post. Will look into getting it polished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaunjones72 Posted July 23, 2014 Author Share Posted July 23, 2014 Here is a close up from the other specimen I found at the same location. It's a flatter, more irregularly shaped rock, and the fossils are less regularly shaped and arranged, but very clear and detailed nonetheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted July 23, 2014 Share Posted July 23, 2014 The difference in shape is due to the angle at which the corals are cut by the surface of the rock. The first specimen cuts the corals horizontally, so the individual corallites look circular. In the second specimen the coral is cut at an angle, so the corallites (which are fairly cylindrical) look like irregular ovals. Don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted July 23, 2014 Share Posted July 23, 2014 Thank you all sincerely. Was kiboshed by the 2MB limit for images, as I have much sharper images too large to post. Will look into getting it polished. You could reduce the size of them using a simple image editing programm like GIMP or Irfan View. Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaunjones72 Posted July 23, 2014 Author Share Posted July 23, 2014 Thanks Don, that's what I figured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaunjones72 Posted July 23, 2014 Author Share Posted July 23, 2014 You could reduce the size of them using a simple image editing programm like GIMP or Irfan View. Hi Ludwigia, I could do it easily if I was at home but I am on holiday with only an ipad and patchy wifi connection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted July 23, 2014 Share Posted July 23, 2014 Ok. I was just trying to be helpful, but now I understand your plight. Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaunjones72 Posted July 23, 2014 Author Share Posted July 23, 2014 Ok. I was just trying to be helpful, but now I understand your plight. I appreciate your help. Everyone has been extremely helpful and knowledgable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted July 24, 2014 Share Posted July 24, 2014 Thank you for the positive feedback. It does us good to receive such responses. Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now