Jump to content

Coprolite Auction


Scylla

Recommended Posts

I was rather doubtful, and invited folks to weigh in here:

http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php?/topic/48247-poop-yes-or-no/

There seems to be a body of opinion that the ID as coprolite is rather presumptive. My money would be on siderite concretion... or rather my money wouldn't be on it at all with that price estimate.

Roger

I keep six honest serving-men (they taught me all I knew);Their names are What and Why and When and How and Where and Who [Rudyard Kipling]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we discussed these "coprolites" in the past and I don't think it is one either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can it be legally auctioned advertised as such? (If not proven to be one.)

Evidently.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is Auspex so fond of saying, caveat emptor!

Ha, I had that in my post, but backspaced to the basic question. ^_^

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a siderite "pseudo-coprolite" and not a coprolite at all. Anyone who has found these in Western Washington knows the odd shapes and forms they can take but they are not coprolites. Never any bones, plant remains, shell remains, etc. There is an older scientific paper (sorry about lack of specifics) that describes potential ways these are formed and one is through mud oozing through knot holes in flood plain tree stumps. Caveat emptor indeed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A web page that discusses these objects is:

Pseudo-poo! All that glitters isn’t fecal gold

by Andrew Farke, PLOS Blogs, July 23, 2014

http://blogs.plos.org/paleo/2014/07/23/pseudo-poo-glitters-isnt-fecal-gold/

The papers that this article cites are:

Mustoe, G. E., 2001, Enigmatic origin of ferruginous “coprolites”:

Evidence from the Miocene Wilkes Formation, southwestern

Washington. Geological Society of America Bulletin vol. 113

no. 6, pp. 673–681. http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/content/113/6/673

Seilacher, A., C. Marshall, H. C. W. Skinner, and T. Tsuihiji,

2001, A fresh look at sideritic “coprolites.” Paleobiology.

vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 7–13. http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/content/27/1/7.abstract

Spencer, P. K., 1993, The “coprolites” that aren’t: The

straight poop on specimens from the Miocene of

southwestern Washington State. Ichnos. vol. 2, no. 2,

pp. 231–236. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10420949309380097

Yancey, T. E., G. E. Mustoe, E. B. Leopold, and M. T.

Heizler, 2013, Mudflow disturbance in latest Miocene

forests in Lewis County, Washington. PALAIOS.

vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 343–358. http://palaios.sepmonline.org/content/28/6/343.short

A wikipedi image is "File:Pseudocoprolite.jpg" at

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pseudocoprolite.jpg

Yours,

Paul H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...