Jump to content

Paleocene Brachiopods From New Jersey


Jeffrey P

Recommended Posts

Made a fairly brief visit to a site in Ocean County, near New Egypt, NJ. on Monday 4/6/15. There was a shell bed exposed in a very muddy narrow ravine composed of the Paleocene brachiopod; Oleneothyris harlani. Collected a number of small specimens. They are extremely fragile and usually crumble when exposed. Will return some time to collect, hopefully better specimens.

post-13044-0-10183200-1429467400_thumb.jpgpost-13044-0-01206500-1429467447_thumb.jpg

Edited by Jeffrey P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

very nice! Would like to trade for some if you get enough to spare.

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen

No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go.

" I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes

"can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done!

Collecting intact shells from glaucanite sands can be pretty challenging.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done!

Collecting intact shells from glaucanite sands can be pretty challenging.

Whew! You're not kidding. Got pretty dirty too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is that round area in the second pic the lophophore showing through from the inside after the shell dissolved away? If so that's one neat fossil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done, Jeff!

Neat finds.

Regards,

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've collected the same species from a site in North Carolina. For a time in the Paleocene these brachiopods were the dominant shelled organisms and formed banks over a significant part of the Atlantic coastline. The front part of the shell was thick and is commonly the only part preserved, as the posterior is quite thin shelled. I did manage to find one that is complete and with both valves together.

Don

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

is that round area in the second pic the lophophore showing through from the inside after the shell dissolved away? If so that's one neat fossil.

I doubt that's the lophophore. It's matrix that filled the shell. Right now I'm leaving it there because the shells are so fragile. Another question is how did the hole get there in the first place. Pretty round to be just random. Possible bore hole from a gastropod? I plan to treat the shells today with Elmers solution to hopefully strengthen the shell material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've collected the same species from a site in North Carolina. For a time in the Paleocene these brachiopods were the dominant shelled organisms and formed banks over a significant part of the Atlantic coastline. The front part of the shell was thick and is commonly the only part preserved, as the posterior is quite thin shelled. I did manage to find one that is complete and with both valves together.

Don

At the site I only saw a couple examples of specimens with both valves together, but they were incomplete. I've seen complete individuals (both valves) at the MAPS (Monmouth Amateur Paleontological Society) collection. Hopefully I can find complete ones next time around. Would love to see pics of your finds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don raised an interesting point. In New Jersey the Hornerstown Formation lies just above the KT

boundary. Fossils, I've heard and seen, are generally scarce, probably a product of unfavorable life

conditions that occurred at the end of the Cretaceous. After a period of time marine life began to

recover and in this void, brachiopods briefly reasserted their dominance only to be replaced by

bivalves. These brachiopod fossils cause me to ponder about the conditions during that transitional

time and the course of marine evolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Oleneothyris abundance (bioherm/biostrome?) is at the contact between the late Paleocene Vincentown and early Paleocene Hornerstown. The Lower Vincentown also has them as well as abundant bryozoa making the fauna have a paleozoic look. The K/T boundary is well before this time period but I don't know how many years. There are Pycnodontid oysters and steinkerns of other mollusca in abundance both before and after the occurrence of the Oleneothyris biostrome. The abundance of brachs and bryozoa recurs in the middle to late Eocene Castle Hayne Formation in NC. I believe that water depth and possibly other environmental factors make these habitats suitable to brachs and bryozoa dominance despite what is in print regarding the K/T extinction causing the dominance.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty cool finds. Nice to see you getting out.

-Dave

__________________________________________________

Geologists on the whole are inconsistent drivers. When a roadcut presents itself, they tend to lurch and weave. To them, the roadcut is a portal, a fragment of a regional story, a proscenium arch that leads their imaginations into the earth and through the surrounding terrain. - John McPhee

If I'm going to drive safely, I can't do geology. - John McPhee

Check out my Blog for more fossils I've found: http://viewsofthemahantango.blogspot.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've learned, Plax is right. During my first visit there I also wondered if the insane abundance of basically nothing but Oleneothyris in these Paleocene sediments was signal of life recovering right after the KT. But those I was with who knew more set me straight. It just seems to be a local concentration due to perfect conditions for these kinds of brachiopods.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, the bed is well after the KT boundary, in the Selandian, ~59mya. There are probably several third order marine sequences included within the Hornerstown fm. I agree with others that the abundance was most likely the result of widespread environmental factors more so than a post KP recovery.

From what I've learned, Plax is right. During my first visit there I also wondered if the insane abundance of basically nothing but Oleneothyris in these Paleocene sediments was signal of life recovering right after the KT. But those I was with who knew more set me straight. It just seems to be a local concentration due to perfect conditions for these kinds of brachiopods.

---Wie Wasser schleift den Stein, wir steigen und fallen---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Oleneothyris abundance (bioherm/biostrome?) is at the contact between the late Paleocene Vincentown and early Paleocene Hornerstown. The Lower Vincentown also has them as well as abundant bryozoa making the fauna have a paleozoic look. The K/T boundary is well before this time period but I don't know how many years. There are Pycnodontid oysters and steinkerns of other mollusca in abundance both before and after the occurrence of the Oleneothyris biostrome. The abundance of brachs and bryozoa recurs in the middle to late Eocene Castle Hayne Formation in NC. I believe that water depth and possibly other environmental factors make these habitats suitable to brachs and bryozoa dominance despite what is in print regarding the K/T extinction causing the dominance.

Thanks for setting me and others straight on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...