Wellnhoferia Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 Do you think these are real or just fabricated fakes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scylla Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 Well... There are some real fossil bits sort of glued together to create a composite art project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh_2727 Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 I'm new to fossil collecting and am trying to learn how to decipher real/fakes, could anyone describe how to spot the fakes where they glue real fossil bits together? Using the above photos, specifically the top 3, am I right to be looking at the excess white colouration along all of the cracks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordTrilobite Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 Personally I don't see anything suspicious on either of these pieces. Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosmoceras Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 No red flags here, IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calhounensis Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 Everything looks legit, maybe a bit of repair where the teeth may have broken off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fossilselachian Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 I would not recognize a Basilosaurus fossil if I tripped over it! However the bone and tooth structure look good to me (forever what that is worth) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave pom Allen Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 look totally authentic to me, a couple of nice pieces . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldigger Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Josh, the white coloration in the cracks is not an indicator of fake. As the enamel ages it may obtain fine cracks and the surrounding matrix may fill the tiny fissures with extremely fine sediments that would be extremely difficult to remove without damaging the tooth. It isn't hurting it, in fact it might actually help in holding them together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Andy- Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 They look real and good to me. Looking forward to meeting my fellow Singaporean collectors! Do PM me if you are a Singaporean, or an overseas fossil-collector coming here for a holiday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 Thumbs up for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elementalmage Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Those are some great pictures. I'm not an expert with this but it looks ok to me. But must add that it's the first time that I've ever seen a basilosaurus fossil. Could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boesse Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 While the fossil is definitely real - there is nothing here that looks sculpted - it's not quite enormous enough to be Basilosaurus. This appears to be more in the size range of a smaller basilosaurid like Dorudon or Zygorhiza. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scylla Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 In light of overwhelming counteropinion I rescind my doubts about this fossil. It just looked like the teeth were glued onto a different bone with plaster similar to those composite Moroccan mosasaur jaws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted June 29, 2015 Share Posted June 29, 2015 I think it is real, with some repairs, but I question the identification. "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cam28 Posted July 1, 2015 Share Posted July 1, 2015 Imho looks legit. Bear in mind many of the archaeocete whales were very similar so it may not be 100% known if it's actually Basilosaurus. More than not, sellers put such titles when they can for maximum profit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redlichia Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Authentic but I'm not sure for the ID. ->>>>> < Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boesse Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Actually, I'll revise my statement: these specimens are absolutely tiny, and definitely are NOT Basilosaurus.Most teeth of Basilosaurus, including the root, are longer than 10 cm. This is some other, much smaller basilosaurid, and is probably even too small for Dorudon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now