Jump to content

Are These Basilosaurus Fossils Real?


Wellnhoferia

Recommended Posts

Well...

There are some real fossil bits sort of glued together to create a composite art project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm new to fossil collecting and am trying to learn how to decipher real/fakes, could anyone describe how to spot the fakes where they glue real fossil bits together? Using the above photos, specifically the top 3, am I right to be looking at the excess white colouration along all of the cracks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I don't see anything suspicious on either of these pieces.

Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything looks legit, maybe a bit of repair where the teeth may have broken off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not recognize a Basilosaurus fossil if I tripped over it! However the bone and tooth structure look good to me (forever what that is worth)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh, the white coloration in the cracks is not an indicator of fake. As the enamel ages it may obtain fine cracks and the surrounding matrix may fill the tiny fissures with extremely fine sediments that would be extremely difficult to remove without damaging the tooth. It isn't hurting it, in fact it might actually help in holding them together.


Dorensigbadges.JPG       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They look real and good to me.

Looking forward to meeting my fellow Singaporean collectors! Do PM me if you are a Singaporean, or an overseas fossil-collector coming here for a holiday!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are some great pictures. I'm not an expert with this but it looks ok to me. But must add that it's the first time that I've ever seen a basilosaurus fossil. Could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the fossil is definitely real - there is nothing here that looks sculpted - it's not quite enormous enough to be Basilosaurus. This appears to be more in the size range of a smaller basilosaurid like Dorudon or Zygorhiza.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In light of overwhelming counteropinion I rescind my doubts about this fossil. It just looked like the teeth were glued onto a different bone with plaster similar to those composite Moroccan mosasaur jaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is real, with some repairs, but I question the identification.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imho looks legit. Bear in mind many of the archaeocete whales were very similar so it may not be 100% known if it's actually Basilosaurus. More than not, sellers put such titles when they can for maximum profit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Actually, I'll revise my statement: these specimens are absolutely tiny, and definitely are NOT Basilosaurus.Most teeth of Basilosaurus, including the root, are longer than 10 cm. This is some other, much smaller basilosaurid, and is probably even too small for Dorudon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...