Jump to content

Id Requested! Dinosaur Fossil? T-Rex?


Kiev

Recommended Posts

Hello -- this is my first post, so many thanks in advance for your time and expertise!

I recently purchased a dinosaur fossil at yard-sale, and the previous owner said it was personally collected by him in Montana back in the 1950s; that’s about all I know about where this piece comes from. The piece measures approximately 10" x 8" x 6", and weighs about 15 lbs.
Unfortunately, I don't know any paleontologists; but, I did show it to a geologist who confirmed that it’s definitely fossilized bone, and from the size and shape, probably dino. Also, he said the piece might possibly be more than one bone fused together.
So, my questions for you are: from what dinosaur species; and which part of the skeleton? Personally, I'm thinking T-Rex . . . !
Cheers!
Kiev

PS -- Please let me know if you would like to see any particular detail of this piece, and I will upload more pix!

post-18875-0-19546700-1435863234_thumb.jpg

post-18875-0-18991900-1435863238_thumb.jpg

post-18875-0-31541600-1435863243_thumb.jpg

post-18875-0-51627100-1435863246_thumb.jpg

post-18875-0-31736600-1435863249_thumb.jpg

Edited by Kiev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum. Boy I'm having trouble getting a handle on your bone. There is nothing diagnostic about it other than its big and bulky. T-rex bones would not be this massive. Do you know anything more about where it was found other than Montana?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, Troodon! Thanks for chiming in. I've shared everything I know (which isn't much) about this specimen in my initial post, so that's it.

My best guess is that it's a partial fragment -- maybe some kind of blade-shaped bone? I should probably upload more pix to show the curvilinear quality of its shape . . .

I'm surprised to read that it might be too big to be T-Rex! Really? Maybe brontosaurus, then?

Also, I think we should consider the area of origin suspect; It might not be from Montana at all -- that's just what the old man who sold it to me claimed.

Meanwhile, we're both stumped, I guess!

KJK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's probably a partial of a leg bone. One option could be from a Ceratopsian if its from Montana. Maybe the images can ring a bell with others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be too big for a T.rex, just too dense. Theropods were lightly built, with highly pneumaticized skeletons; light and quick, like a bird.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Auspex: Aha! Now that makes sense -- thanks! So, we must deduce that it belongs to something large and slow . . . ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting bone. I am also stumped. The preservation is not typical of the Hell Creek Fm, so it may not be dinosaur. Some of the pix look like titanothere atlas (neck bone)... But that is just a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting bone. I am also stumped. The preservation is not typical of the Hell Creek Fm, so it may not be dinosaur. Some of the pix look like titanothere atlas (neck bone)... But that is just a guess.

Now that guy would of made a good pot of soup. :drool:

Sorry, dinner time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...