Jump to content

Found This Fossil In A Rock. Near A River At Mt. Baker Washington State.

iHeartRivers

By iHeartRivers
in Fossil ID

 Share

Recommended Posts

iHeartRivers Newbie

iHeartRivers

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hey guys, I found this fossil yesterday. I'm not a pro at this kind of stuff and need help identifying what it could be. It is roughly 4.25 inches long.

Anyways, thanks :)

Pictures:

https://m.imgur.com/a/tSfI3

Edited by iHeartRivers
Link to comment
Share on other sites
abyssunder Regular Member

abyssunder

Posted
Posted

Welcome to the Forum! :)
I imported few of them to be easily viewed by others, hope you don't mind.

post-17588-0-20162800-1443390548_thumb.jpgpost-17588-0-51533300-1443390560_thumb.jpgpost-17588-0-41881900-1443390600_thumb.jpgpost-17588-0-05728100-1443390664_thumb.jpg

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ynot Regular Member

ynot

Posted
Posted (edited)

This look more geologic than biologic to Me.

Some type of a siltstone maybe.

Tony

PS Welcome to TFF.

Edited by ynot

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
abyssunder Regular Member

abyssunder

Posted
Posted

In my opinion is not a fossil but something related to the formation of septarian, so I guess is geological.

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iHeartRivers Newbie

iHeartRivers

Posted
  • Author
Posted

This look more geologic than biologic to Me.

Some type of a siltstone maybe.

Tony

PS Welcome to TFF.

In my opinion is not a fossil but something related to the formation of septarian, so I guess is geological.

Thanks for the help. :)

But that doesn't explain the first picture though. It looks a lot like an animal imprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Auspex Regular Member

Auspex

Posted
Posted

Neither the imprint nor the entrained clasts give off an organic vibe for me.

I think it is some of Ma Nature's geological handiwork. :)

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iHeartRivers Newbie

iHeartRivers

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Neither the imprint nor the entrained clasts give off an organic vibe for me.

I think it is some of Ma Nature's geological handiwork. :)

Oh alright, thanks :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Herb Regular Member

Herb

Posted
Posted

Looks geologic to me also.

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen

No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go.

" I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes

"can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...