Jump to content

Help on those Id's!


Guguita2104

Recommended Posts

I found these fossils last weekend in Praia da Consolação, near Peniche (Kimmerdgian layers) and I labelled them as solitary corals.However I read in some sites that rudists are pretty common in that location. For that I'm a bit confuse, because I never understood the main differences between rudists and solitary corals.

Can someone explain me these (and Id my fossils)?

Regards,

1-post-18967-0-61433500-1450896193_thumb.jpg

post-18967-0-02486200-1450896232_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between a solitary rugose coral and a rudist, in a few words, is that the latter is a marine heterodont bivalve with totally different morphology.

Here are comparative examples: Rudist post-17588-0-04363900-1450898124_thumb.jpgpost-17588-0-32743400-1450898129_thumb.gif Rugose coral post-17588-0-23189200-1450898163_thumb.jpg

What you have there are Horn corals (rugose corals), IMO, but if you said they are from Kimmeridgian layers probably they're solitary Scleractinian corals (Stony corals), not Rudists.

Edited by abyssunder
  • I found this Informative 2

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to abyssunder from the grand stands as well. Boy, Rudists really can look a lot like horn coral at times.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...