Jump to content

Mammoth tusk fragment or Pet. Wood or..? Need help with ID PLEASE!


Kikisue

Recommended Posts

Any thoughts on this piece my boyfriend found today at Port Williams beach in Sequim, WA? It was in the bluff half exposed after a fresh slide. No scale to weigh it here...but it's pretty heavy probably 4-5 pounds.post-20625-0-30561000-1454818739_thumb.jpgpppost-20625-0-10717800-1454819182_thumb.jpg

More photos in following post.

Thank you!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely mammoth tusk. Those little spores indicate it is bone.

"Welcome...To Jurassic Park!" -Richard Attenborough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not seeing any Schreger lines.

I think that would rule out tusk.

I would guess it is a piece of bone.

Someone else may know what it is.

Regards,

  • I found this Informative 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not seeing any Schreger lines.

I think that would rule out tusk.

I would guess it is a piece of bone.

Someone else may know what it is.

Regards,

I agree. Bone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely mammoth tusk. Those little spores indicate it is bone.

At least I got half correct! I'm a bit of an amateur. :P

Edited by Pterodactyl

"Welcome...To Jurassic Park!" -Richard Attenborough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the info, I see the difference now. He'll be bummed it's not ivory but I think it's still a pretty cool find!

It's definitely a neat find. Large bone chunk. Perhaps enough features present that someone on here might be able to take a stab at what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least I got half correct! I'm a bit of an amateur. :P

Always avoid using "definitely" unless there is no way to be mistaken. And unless you've seen it all (and none of us has), and especially when looking at photos (as opposed to the real object) it's wisest to use cautious language.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...