Jump to content

JDSSKW

Recommended Posts

I found this on Topsail Beach NC. I do not know very much about invertebrate fossils at all. Any thoughts? Much appreciated. Thank you in advance!

post-19830-0-70796700-1457315511_thumb.jpeg

post-19830-0-87959500-1457315528_thumb.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like worm tubes not a sponge. Does it fizz in HCl? If yes than it is calcite?

  • I found this Informative 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with worm tubes. I ocassioanally find these on the NC coast and have a very large chunk from South Carolina. I've spend a lot of time trying to find which species make these but haven't had much luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bright yellow boring sponge Cliona celata may attack living or non-living shells or pebbles, making regular-shaped circular holes on the surface not by drilling but secreting chemicals (acids) to penetrate the calcium-based substrates on which they live,releasing amoebocytes. The holes may cover the entire surface of the object appearing as a single row with increasing size that open into a labyrinth of interconnected tunnels deeper down below the surface.This inner damage is revealed when the outer surface is collapsing.

  • I found this Informative 1

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bright yellow boring sponge Cliona celata may attack living or non-living shells or pebbles, making regular-shaped circular holes on the surface not by drilling but secreting chemicals (acids) to penetrate the calcium-based substrates on which they live,releasing amoebocytes. The holes may cover the entire surface of the object appearing as a single row with increasing size that open into a labyrinth of interconnected tunnels deeper down below the surface.This inner damage is revealed when the outer surface is collapsing.

I don't think this one is Cliona. This fossil has definite tubes. I have never seen Cliona form distinct tubes. Here's a Mercenaria shell I keep on my desk with Cliona borings. It used to be a nice whole shell until a coworker decided to see what the inside looked like.

post-2301-0-72707500-1457354624_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather than burrows made in a substrate, it looks more like a bunch of tube worms encrusted together. Everything on the second picture looks like part of a tube secreted by a tube worm. Sort of like this but much more extreme and more weathered:

p1160819blog3.jpg?w=584

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this one is Cliona. This fossil has definite tubes. I have never seen Cliona form distinct tubes. Here's a Mercenaria shell I keep on my desk with Cliona borings. It used to be a nice whole shell until a coworker decided to see what the inside looked like.

attachicon.gif20160307_073438.jpg

You are correct.

What you have there is called Entobia (Bronn, 1838) trace fossil made by clionaid sponges. One of them is Cliona (Grant, 1826).

The specimen in question is bored by tube worms. https://natureinfocus.wordpress.com/2011/04/12/pebbles-with-holes-made-by-tube-worms/

Mark Wilson

http://woostergeologists.scotblogs.wooster.edu/2012/05/13/woosters-fossils-of-the-week-intricate-networks-of-tiny-holes-clionaid-sponge-borings/

Jessica Winder

https://natureinfocus.wordpress.com/tag/sponge-borings/

https://natureinfocus.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/sponge-borings-in-flat-oyster-shells/

Edited by abyssunder

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say it looks an awful lot like a pumice stone (as previously stated). Here is an image comparison:

post-20836-0-89347700-1457368677_thumb.jpeg

So there you go. One vote for pumice.

Edited by MeargleSchmeargl

Every single fossil you see is a miracle set in stone, and should be treated as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say it looks an awful lot like a pumice stone (as previously stated). Here is an image comparison:

attachicon.gif2016-03-07-11-34-28--1088106255.jpeg

So there you go. One vote for pumice.

I thought so too when I saw the first picture. But the second picture shows some pretty definite structure of tubes. Pumice doesn't weather like that. A pumice would be porous on all sides. But this one has so many long concave structures, and the concave area is smooth. If you have collected tube worms you'd find it very familiar, as that is exactly how tube worms look when the top of the tube is broken off. I have a piece that shows it quite well, with some parts broken and some parts intact to show it's indeed tube worm:

post-19410-0-25712600-1457372045_thumb.jpg

post-19410-0-11013000-1457372047_thumb.jpg

Edited by sdsnl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-17588-0-79933800-1457384524_thumb.jpgpost-17588-0-53515200-1457384534_thumb.jpg

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two votes on pumice.

Sorry guys I see some tube action but still appears to be the pumice used in landscape.

Almost vermiculite. Without the bubble burst effect, More tube than bubble.

If it is lightweight and floats what then?

Jess B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a similar piece that I brought home from a beach South Carolina. This one is almost a foot across. On one side you can see an encrusting coral and several holes from pholid clams.

post-2301-0-79946300-1457436733_thumb.jpg post-2301-0-91517600-1457436743_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather than it being a volcanic product, how about it being a carbonate formation?

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with the not-pumice crowd. Specimen is pretty dark for pumice and the texture is unlike any igneous rocks I have seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put a drop of acid on it; this will either confirm or rule out carbonate.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To follow up. I took the piece in to the Aurora Fossil Museum to see if they could identify it -- worm tubes it is!

Thank all of you for the help. I really appreciate it!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The early bird (first to reply) got the worm (ID correct). ^_^

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...