Jump to content

Dorian'

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I would like to show you some plants that I found in the (middle probably) Bathonian of the soutwestern France, near the edge of the "Massif Central".

So, I will describe the context of the find quicly :

We can find some vegetals in micritic layers intercalated in sublitographic-limestone layers, very often they're fragments of lignitized wood (sometimes with a wonderful conservation and visible tracheids) but it can be reddish wood not lignitized or fragments of leaves.

The first mention that I found is Monteil (1977) who indicates the discovery in a neighboring township of two leaf imprints of Otozamites sp. But this source isn't necessarily the most reliable because there are many inaccuracies or errors, but this is the only mention found this period and this area.

So, for my own samples, this would be a flora from "wetlands", unusual for the french Jurassic (I believe that only one was found but a little younger, from the upper Oxfordian) and, more interesting, one (at least) of them was supposed to be Sagenopteris sp., a species of Caytoniales ("seed ferns"), never found in France.

So here are the leaf imprints (or leaves) of some samples (normally the scales are correct but it is possible that I made a mistake). If someone has an identification idea or a suggestion I would be very grateful to him.

191773571.png

1a : Fern ?

680617232.png

1b

504709903.png

2 Fern with sporangia

657745314.png

3 ?

684184475.png

4 Fern with sporangia

373182766.png

5 Fern with sporangia

652961727.png

6

486701408.png

7

459703409.png

8

5833612110.png

9 Fern with sporangia ?

2695571111.png

10 Fern with sporangium

3888846312.png

11

9268783213.png

12

3915312014.png

13

8449466315.png

14 Fern ?

1366987716.png

15

Edited by Dorian'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5662741917.png

16

7661068818.png

17

And the presumed Sagenopteris sp. :

974595560.png

18

It's sample (traduction : half-fragment of leaf of fern without nervation with sporangium, corresponding to the tenth) :

433696aannot.png

5675069718.png

19 (Sagenopteris?)

7629922619.png

20 (the same?)

3415611820.png

21 Stem ?

8831116621.png

22 Lignitized wood

6780773222.png

23 Coiled leaf

6320024723.png

24 (Sagenopteris?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonderful images, and a potentially significant find!

Congratulations.

Regards,

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To explain a little better the context if someone is interested : Massif Central's coasts were very close (in middle Bathonian, even if it this not the same level, less than a kilometer from the deposit there are ripple marks), plants probably cames from the Massif Central (or from a lagoon off this one) wich was at that time some high moutains (remains from the Hercynian belt) bordered by a vast peneplain. Other plant deposits were reported for the middle Jurassic on its west border but never explored.

Also, there are, in the micritic limestone, some ovoids wich are may be oolites (in small amounts, always dispersed and never perfectly spherical), or oncoids, if it is oolites we should may be be able to associate with smaller fragments (environment agitated including more broken leaves). Some crystals are also found, sometimes in high levels, certainly gypsum, that might be evaporites and indicate a temporary emersion (and possibly provide additional information confirming the presence of a lagoon).

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be a starting point,although I'm no specialist in this, so what would I say is merely a guess. I'm leaning toward something like Phlebopteris rather than Sagenopteris. I've seen a few from the Bathonian Great Oolite Series of Leicestershire, UK and I think they looks close to yours (at least to some of them). Here are some specimens that I think could be considered as reference. Try to compare.

Sagenopteris sp. post-17588-0-98723100-1460676153_thumb.jpg post-17588-0-66707200-1460676186_thumb.jpg Phlebopteris woodwardii

The Stomatal Ontogeny and Structure of the Liassic Pteridosperm Sagenopteris (Caytoniales) from Hungary.pdf

  • I found this Informative 3

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recognize that I was suprised by this identification proposed by a PhD student which appeared quite self-confident but the pictures Sagenopteris show a very different morphology (in fact there are not many picture on internet and I thought than he had access to more papers than me). For Phlebopteris it looks more like my finds and this genus is signaled for the middle Bathonian of France but it would take more pictures to confirm, I'll see what I can find. I had already the study of Barbacka and Boka, it is the best source of pictures of Sagenopteris that I find.

I'm very grateful to you for the help and this new possiblity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I realise that I'm not back to give you some news about my plants.

So in fact, like abyssunder said, and after a serious identification by a researcher (that I thank very much) it is a Phlebopteris leaf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to hear that someone probably more knowledgeable than me is confirming my thought, leading to the same conclusion. Thank you for the reprise.
Also, specimen 22,  I think could be a cycadeoid cone.

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks again, for the cone I think too and I don't know why i've noted "Lignitized wood", it's a mistake. Nevertheless I don't know if it is a cycadeoid or a conifer cone like the researcher said, I don't really know how to recognize and differentiate both (if you have any paper about it I am interested)..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...