Jump to content

Ordovician Craigleith; Orthoceras?


GavySwan

Recommended Posts

I'm still a beginner, and IDing finds is challenging. Anyone able to help me along?

This fossil was found in Craigleith, Ontario. Ordovician shale.

I didn't have a ruler with me for scale, but it was about 1.5" long and 1/3" wide at the widest point.

My first thought was part of a trilobite but after a closer look at the photos it reminds me more of an Orthoceras. Only I have never seen one this small.

Please point me in the right direction!

Thanks!

P.s. I've also attached a photo of our trilobite find. Pseudogygites latimarginatus?

post-21808-0-40546800-1466898383_thumb.png

post-21808-0-25985700-1466898625_thumb.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pseudogygites latimarginatus is correct.

 

Here is an excellent publication with a list of faunal assemblages for Craigleith: LINK

 

Liberty, B.A. (1969)
Paleozoic geology of the Lake Simcoe area, Ontario.
Geological Survey of Canada Memoir, 355:1-201
 
 
 

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still a beginner, and IDing finds is challenging. Anyone able to help me along?

This fossil was found in Craigleith, Ontario. Ordovician shale.

I didn't have a ruler with me for scale, but it was about 1.5" long and 1/3" wide at the widest point.

My first thought was part of a trilobite but after a closer look at the photos it reminds me more of an Orthoceras. Only I have never seen one this small.

Please point me in the right direction!

Thanks!

P.s. I've also attached a photo of our trilobite find. Pseudogygites latimarginatus?

attachicon.gifimage.png

attachicon.gifimage.jpeg

I agree with orthoconic nautiloid.However, for what I've read, Orthoceras is not anymore used as generic name.It's only applied as a genus to the type-specie Orthoceras regulare (wich is only found in some European countries).

I'm also with Pseudogygites latimarginatus on the trilo.

Regards,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Guguita. That makes sense re: Orthoceras; I was using an old publication on the Craigleith fossils to help identify and they were usin it as a generic name. Good to know!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...