icycatelf Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 (edited) The seashell fossils I usually find in the driveway gravel (not local) are brachiopods, but this one is larger (almost 3cm long), seems more oblong, and the umbo(?) is more curled. Based on the image results, I'm leaning toward bivalve, but I'm not confident about it. The humidity is fogging up my lens, preventing me from taking the photos outside. Please bear with the quality. (EDIT: Better pics in post #8.) Edited July 5, 2016 by icycatelf Casual surface-collector and Pokémon fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWill Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Bivalve, I would say oyster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeargleSchmeargl Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Bivalve, I would say oyster. I agree. Every single fossil you see is a miracle set in stone, and should be treated as such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guguita2104 Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 I agree with oyster bivalve. Regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockSmith Posted July 4, 2016 Share Posted July 4, 2016 Nice little "Devils Toenail" as we call them in Central Texas, or Gryphaea. Good find for a driveway! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeargleSchmeargl Posted July 4, 2016 Share Posted July 4, 2016 Nice little "Devils Toenail" as we call them in Central Texas, or Gryphaea. Good find for a driveway! Confirmed. The specimen does indeed match Gryphaea. Every single fossil you see is a miracle set in stone, and should be treated as such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted July 4, 2016 Share Posted July 4, 2016 I am not convinced it is a bivalve. I can think of several brachiopods that would also look like this. If the gravel usually yields brachiopods, it is unlikely that the source would be Cretaceous and it is unlikely that the fossil is a Gryphea ("devil's toenails"). Can we see a photo that clearly shows the umbo/"beak" area? It looks as if it would be easy to remove more of the matrix and expose the shell better, which would be helpful. Don 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icycatelf Posted July 4, 2016 Author Share Posted July 4, 2016 (edited) Here are some better-quality pics, including a better shot of the umbo: Edited July 4, 2016 by icycatelf Casual surface-collector and Pokémon fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmaier Posted July 4, 2016 Share Posted July 4, 2016 Bilateral symmetry, classic "lamp shell" shape... looks kind of brachiopodish to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herb Posted July 4, 2016 Share Posted July 4, 2016 (edited) looks like a Mississippian Platyceras sp. to me. There are no Cretaceous fossils in Kentucky Edited July 4, 2016 by Herb 1 "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go. " I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes "can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icycatelf Posted July 4, 2016 Author Share Posted July 4, 2016 (edited) I see a resemblance to Platyceras, but isn't it a little too flat to be one? Also, the end doesn't look quite as curly as Gryphaea (and, again, it looks a little too flat).This picture is making me lean toward brachiopod:http://jurassiccoast.org/fossilfinder/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/09/2_Brachiopod_A_copyright_Nicholls_2014_904x478.jpg Edited July 4, 2016 by icycatelf Casual surface-collector and Pokémon fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herb Posted July 4, 2016 Share Posted July 4, 2016 (edited) Platyceras' are often flat in the Miss. of KY. Where did you find it (town) Edited July 4, 2016 by Herb 2 "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go. " I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes "can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icycatelf Posted July 4, 2016 Author Share Posted July 4, 2016 Platyceras' are often flat in the Miss. of KY. Where did you find it (town) I found it in Whitehouse (Johnson County), but the gravel was brought in from elsewhere. howard_l once mentioned that they came from the Slade formation. Casual surface-collector and Pokémon fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWill Posted July 4, 2016 Share Posted July 4, 2016 If you want a better ID than bivalve or brachiopod you'll need to try to knock the matrix off of there for a better look at the rest of it. Since it's just driveway gravel and you're not sure about the source it won't matter if it gets damaged in the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herb Posted July 4, 2016 Share Posted July 4, 2016 Looks like you are in a Miss. or Penn. strata area. The tiny bit of Cretaceous in western KY (land between the lakes area) has no fossils "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go. " I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes "can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
howard_l Posted July 4, 2016 Share Posted July 4, 2016 I think Herb may have it. Here are some Platyceras from Mississippian age from various locations near Kentucky the last one I found in Meniffee Co. In the Nada. 1 Howard_L http://triloman.wix.com/kentucky-fossils Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icycatelf Posted July 5, 2016 Author Share Posted July 5, 2016 (edited) Not sure if it'll help with the ID, but did anyone else notice the crease at the end? (Runs the opposite direction of the texture lines.) Edited July 5, 2016 by icycatelf Casual surface-collector and Pokémon fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWill Posted July 5, 2016 Share Posted July 5, 2016 Not sure if it helps either. How about an end view to show it better? The lines forming the texture are called growth lines and represent each new layer of shell material laid down on the inside of each valve. As the body grows and needs more space each new layer extends out a little farther than the last. Some bivalves and brachiopods also have ornamental lines either paralleling or crossing the growth lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icycatelf Posted July 5, 2016 Author Share Posted July 5, 2016 Posterior view (animated to show the crease): Casual surface-collector and Pokémon fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWill Posted July 5, 2016 Share Posted July 5, 2016 Thanks for the new view. That interruption in symmetry should convince everyone that Herb is right. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icycatelf Posted July 10, 2016 Author Share Posted July 10, 2016 Anymore opinions? Casual surface-collector and Pokémon fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Gastropod is a good bet, I think. Looks a bit too smooth to be a horn coral. Don't think bivalve or brachiopod, either. Regards, Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now