discarded2 Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I found this about 20 years ago. I was once told it was a fossilized crinoid blossom. I can see some similarities but nothing I've seen is close enough for me to be sure. Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discarded2 Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 One more picture. It has quartz crystals on the inside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Where was this found? Looks a bit big for a crinoid calyx. I think you may have some rugose corals there. Regards, Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discarded2 Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 Edgar county, Illinois. I found it while walking in a field. Only a small part of it was exposed. I thought it was a rotten tomato so, naturally, I kicked it. It wasn't a rotten tomato. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discarded2 Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 Thank you for your speedy input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Ouch! No problem. I am not seeing the plates you would expect to see on a crinoid calyx. I suppose it could be geodized, which can alter the shape of things. Let's wait to see what some others have to say. It is cool, whatever it is - I would have kept it. Regards, Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmaier Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I agree with a colony of five rugose corals. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Nothing about the specimen indicates a crinoid or other echinoderm, except the five-fold symmetry. As Tim said, there is no indication of any of the plate structure one would expect to see. Instead the surface is covered with wrinkles which are highly similar to growth lines of rugose corals. I agree the specimen is most likely a colony of rugose corals. Don 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 This appears to be a Mississippian geode which may have developed from some organic focus with pentameric symmetry (like a crinoid calyx). Other diagnostic features are obliterated by the deposit of silica. You might label it a "pseudomorph after crinoid calyx," and who could argue with that. 4 http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxytropidoceras Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 (edited) I would agree with the identification that it is a Mississippian geode and a pseudomorph after a part of a crinoid. It is a silica pseudomorph of an anhydrite pseudomorph of part of a crinoid that has pentameric symmetry. The initial replacement of a crinoid fossil by anhydrite often "explodes" the shape of the original fossil into an object barely recognizable because of the increased volume of the replacing anhydrite. Go see: Chowns, T. M., and Elkins, J. E. (1974), The origin of quartz geodes and cauliflower cherts through the silicification of anhydrite nodules, Journal of Sedimentary Petrology. vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 885-903. Maliva, R. C. (1987), Quartz geodes: Early diagenetic silicified anhydrite nodules related to dolomitization, Journal of Sedimentary Geology. vol. 57, pp.1054-1059. Milliken, K. L. (1979), The silicified evaporite syndrome: Two aspects of silicification history of former evaporite nodules from southern Kentucky and northern Tennessee: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology. vol. 49, pp. 245-256. Chowns and Elkins (1974) discusses and illustrates what happens to crinoids when they were replaced by anhydrite. Also, look at: "The Gee!-Ode" What a weird hide, With such joy inside! by Bob Jarrett, The Georgia Mineral Society, Inc. http://www.gamineral.org/writings/geodes-jarrett.html Yours, Paul H. Edited July 23, 2016 by Oxytropidoceras 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discarded2 Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 Thank you all for your input! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 (edited) or: Henchiri(2006) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229724139_Silicification_of_sulphate_evaporites_and_their_carbonate_replacements_in_Eocene_marine_sediments_Tunisia_Two_diagenetic_trends or: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230364535_Silicification_and_dolomitization_of_anhydrite_nodules_in_argillaceous_terrestrial_deposits_An_example_of_meteoric-dominated_diagenesis_from_the_Triassic_of_central_Spain Edited July 23, 2016 by doushantuo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 It is a geodized crinoid calyx , I agree. Nice find ! Similar one is in this older TFF post : http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php?/topic/22442-geodized-fossil/ 2 " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discarded2 Posted July 24, 2016 Author Share Posted July 24, 2016 That's what it is for sure! Thanks so much! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 I now agree, especially after reading some of the links Oxytropidoceras gave, that the specimen may well have originally been a crinoid calyx, with the plate structure now totally erased by anhydrate growth. Don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now