Jump to content

Crinoid blossom? Found in East-Central Illinois


discarded2

Recommended Posts

I found this about 20 years ago. I was once told it was a fossilized crinoid blossom. I can see some similarities but nothing I've seen is close enough for me to be sure. Thanks in advance.

post-22040-0-63565300-1469270387_thumb.jpg

post-22040-0-67997400-1469270405_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where was this found?

Looks a bit big for a crinoid calyx.

I think you may have some rugose corals there.

Regards,

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edgar county, Illinois. I found it while walking in a field. Only a small part of it was exposed. I thought it was a rotten tomato so, naturally, I kicked it. It wasn't a rotten tomato.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ouch! :blink:

No problem. :)

I am not seeing the plates you would expect to see on a crinoid calyx.

I suppose it could be geodized, which can alter the shape of things.

Let's wait to see what some others have to say.

It is cool, whatever it is - I would have kept it. ;)

Regards,

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing about the specimen indicates a crinoid or other echinoderm, except the five-fold symmetry. As Tim said, there is no indication of any of the plate structure one would expect to see. Instead the surface is covered with wrinkles which are highly similar to growth lines of rugose corals. I agree the specimen is most likely a colony of rugose corals.

Don

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This appears to be a Mississippian geode which may have developed from some organic focus with pentameric symmetry (like a crinoid calyx). Other diagnostic features are obliterated by the deposit of silica. You might label it a "pseudomorph after crinoid calyx," and who could argue with that.

post-42-0-93676500-1469280762_thumb.jpg post-42-0-75577600-1469280788_thumb.jpg post-42-0-02196200-1469280816_thumb.jpg

  • I found this Informative 4

http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page

 

What seest thou else

In the dark backward and abysm of time?

---Shakespeare, The Tempest

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree with the identification that it is a Mississippian geode and

a pseudomorph after a part of a crinoid. It is a silica pseudomorph of an

anhydrite pseudomorph of part of a crinoid that has pentameric symmetry.

The initial replacement of a crinoid fossil by anhydrite often "explodes"

the shape of the original fossil into an object barely recognizable because

of the increased volume of the replacing anhydrite.

Go see:

Chowns, T. M., and Elkins, J. E. (1974), The origin of quartz geodes and

cauliflower cherts through the silicification of anhydrite nodules, Journal

of Sedimentary Petrology. vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 885-903.

Maliva, R. C. (1987), Quartz geodes: Early diagenetic silicified anhydrite

nodules related to dolomitization, Journal of Sedimentary Geology.

vol. 57, pp.1054-1059.

Milliken, K. L. (1979), The silicified evaporite syndrome: Two aspects of

silicification history of former evaporite nodules from southern Kentucky

and northern Tennessee: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology. vol. 49,

pp. 245-256.

Chowns and Elkins (1974) discusses and illustrates what happens to

crinoids when they were replaced by anhydrite.

Also, look at:

"The Gee!-Ode" What a weird hide, With such joy inside!

by Bob Jarrett, The Georgia Mineral Society, Inc.

http://www.gamineral.org/writings/geodes-jarrett.html

Yours,

Paul H.

Edited by Oxytropidoceras
  • I found this Informative 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a geodized crinoid calyx , I agree. Nice find ! Similar one is in this older TFF post : http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php?/topic/22442-geodized-fossil/

post-17588-0-85630500-1469296757_thumb.jpgpost-17588-0-96921400-1469296779_thumb.jpg

  • I found this Informative 2

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I now agree, especially after reading some of the links Oxytropidoceras gave, that the specimen may well have originally been a crinoid calyx, with the plate structure now totally erased by anhydrate growth.

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...