Jump to content
Troodon

Fossils of the Hell Creek, New Book

Recommended Posts

siteseer
On April 8, 2017 at 0:09 AM, Susan from PA said:

Well put @siteseer!   The really funny part, is that the beta version that I saw, was purchased by friends who have a micro site channel from the Hell Creek Formation on their land.  They purchased the book because they thought it would help them identify fossils that they collect and sell.   I will be interested to see if the version published for sale contains the same statement in its front cover.  

 

Those Patriots are charmed, aren't they? (Cowboys fan here. Please don't hold it against me. :) ).  

 

 

Cowboys fan??!!  I'm old enough to remember Super Bowl VI.  I won't hold it against you, though.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
siteseer
On September 22, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Susan from PA said:

Beta version was $275, I believe.  

 

 

 

I think it's weird that the pre-release version cost anything at all.  You'd reserve them for friends and colleagues to comment on and maybe even make notes inside and return.

 

I wonder how they arrived at $275 in the first place.  That's a lot of money for a book.  It would have to be widely-seen as indispensable to professionals and amateurs to generate decent sales.  Even then, a price that high may be too much for a majority of its intended customers.  Henri Cappetta's first edition (1987) and the long-awaited revised edition (2012) of his Chondrichthyes II (well-received fossil shark and ray reference) both suffered from an even higher sticker price leaving many researchers unable to get their own copy unless they got it as a gift or saved up for it.  I still don't have a copy though I've seen excerpts.

 

In David Ward's review of the first edition of Chondrichthyes II, he finished with "Pity about the price."

 

Jess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jpc

I would also like to think that a book with such a high price would feature pictures of very good specimens.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Canadawest
11 hours ago, jpc said:

I would also like to think that a book with such a high price would feature pictures of very good specimens.  

 

I'm still not getting what the book is about.  Why do I want to buy a book with photos of incomplete specimens collected by a few individuals?  There's publications elsewhere.

 

The example of an incomplete ornithomimid ungual.  Why not a complete one?  Why an eroded croc vertebra and not a more diagnostic specimen.?  Is this a guide or just a catalogue of their findings?   If they are 'experienced'  field researchers..why wouldn't they have found better specimens?    It seems its not a guide to Hell Creek Formation material but a guide to a localized site that was 'ok' at best.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jpc
31 minutes ago, Canadawest said:

 

I'm still not getting what the book is about.  Why do I want to buy a book with photos of incomplete specimens collected by a few individuals?  There's publications elsewhere.

 

The example of an incomplete ornithomimid ungual.  Why not a complete one?  Why an eroded croc vertebra and not a more diagnostic specimen.?  Is this a guide or just a catalogue of their findings?   If they are 'experienced'  field researchers..why wouldn't they have found better specimens?    It seems its not a guide to Hell Creek Formation material but a guide to a localized site that was 'ok' at best.

 

 

Yeah, and at that level it seems a silly project.  Hell, I bet I can do a better job with my fossils and the collections managers I know... and then to add some folks like you into the mix... it would be easy enough to make a much better 'field guide'.  I have same complaint about the new White River fossil book put out by the folks at Badlands National Park.  Lots of good info in that one, but they used mediocre pictures of mediocre fossils when I know there exist much much better specimens 

 

End of rant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
doushantuo

a while back i posted on the lithostratigraphy of Hell Creek,BTW

I think it went totally(or nearly so) unnoticed:D 

A good deal of dinosaur literature can be gotten from Fruitbat and generally speaking,online publications .

The drawback might be that what I mean are the trade journals(JVP,e.g.),and scientific terminology is used in those publications.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fossilmaster3

This post is very informative, thanks pal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
doushantuo

infernalbodyofwaterpt2

a sample of what's in that article,plus a nice hedgehog that yours truly put there.D:permineralized cones

bercofimages.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Troodon

I think collectors would love an all encompassing book around the Hell Creek that is easy to understand with good photos of specimens.  It would be an excellent reference source.  The beta copy falls appears to short of that in many aspects but still gives vertebrate collectors a taste of what's out there.   Unless it's reasonably priced it's not going to have much appeal.  The project may have had an initial design but to rely exclusively on what was collected was a bit shortsided and is counter to the title of the book.  Will see what it looks like after its published.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
doushantuo

How good an author are you?:P:D

People like what you post ,so you seem to have the uncanny knack of understanding what "Joe Public"" wants. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Troodon

 

15 minutes ago, doushantuo said:

How good an author are you?:P:D

People like what you post ,so you seem to have the uncanny knack of understanding what "Joe Public"" wants. 

 

Thanks,  but NO NO with being an author.  I do however understand what collectors need because being one I struggle to find information I can use and understand for my own collection.  So if its something that makes sense to me there is a good chance others might like it. Papers are good but much to technical for most who just want to be shown what a specimen looks likes, what it belongs to and how to identify it.  Give them that, it will make them happy collectors. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
doushantuo

 

I often find it difficult to understand what i'm looking at,without the "technical specification"*

You yourself and the others in this thread noticed what CAN happen when trying to (over)popularize science :overblown prices

*And the funny thing is: I sure know how to get my technical literature,but i have YET TO FIND A GOOD,GENERAL BOOK on BONE that's NOT behind paywalls

BTW:i am keepin my eye on a piece by Tinius on general(=vertebrate) claw morphometrics.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×