Stingray Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 Another strange find today looks like a trilobite ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 24, 2016 Author Share Posted September 24, 2016 Another angle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 24, 2016 Author Share Posted September 24, 2016 One more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnBrewer Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 Nice find whatever it is. John Map of UK fossil sites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 24, 2016 Author Share Posted September 24, 2016 Terataspis was what @FossilDAWG thought it might be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Great find, Chris! I agree with Don, - definitely Terataspis. Don't know if you have the Linsley PDF. This is the plate of Terataspis from it. Thanks for posting it! Regards, 4 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 25, 2016 Author Share Posted September 25, 2016 Tim, Now I have to slowly uncover it and see how much is under there... Thanks for the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Good luck, Chris! Stay patient. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey P Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 That's a helluva find. I think it is better than the other one you showed me and I have no doubt that it is Terataspis. How big is that specimen? I know they could get pretty big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 25, 2016 Author Share Posted September 25, 2016 One Eye on this was the size of Washington's head on a Quarter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php?/topic/68282-coral-pleurodictyum-americanum/&do=findComment&comment=719401 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 That is a very nice chunk of a Terataspis. The intact spines are especially rare, hopefully you'll be able to salvage them. I think there is a bryozoan colony attached; bryozoan epifauna were not unusual on large trilobites like this. Great find! Don 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 25, 2016 Author Share Posted September 25, 2016 Now the hunt begins for a complete specimen.... Hey ya never know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 26, 2016 Author Share Posted September 26, 2016 Update on Prep. First picture start of prep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 26, 2016 Author Share Posted September 26, 2016 Currently working Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 26, 2016 Author Share Posted September 26, 2016 Spines starting to show Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Looking good, Chris. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funfordds Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Nice find. What formation or county did this come from? In the past i've come across some similar parts of what I believe to be terataspis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 27, 2016 Author Share Posted September 27, 2016 Hi Funfordds, . United States, NY, Coymans formation, Devonian. They are strange critters 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funfordds Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Awesome, keep us posed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 Update on prep......Also I will be donating this to the NYS Museum when I'm finished Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDudeCO Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Very nice! And congrats! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GerryK Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 What you have is definitely not a Terataspis. The ornamentation on the glabella is wrong for Terataspis. Terataspis has many small pustules, while your specimen has few large pustules. I’m having a hard time determining what trilobite you have. You state that it comes from the Coeymans Formation but I don’t know of any Lichid that comes from the Coeymans. It looks similar to Oinochoe pustulosus from the New Scotland Formation but is different with the long spines at the back of the glabella. If it does come from the Coeymans Formation, you may have something new and if it is, carefully prepare it. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 Gerrry, Thanks I will verify my geological formation as there are many thrust faults in that location. Identification - The find does contain small ( pustules) they are so small I cannot get a better picture of them, as for the quantity of them may not be as numerous as descriptions of current finds. My thought, It may be possible as they molted they became spineyer as this is a small specimen for T.Grandis if it is one. I sent another part of a cephalon to a university in Georgia and the professor there seemed to think it was that species , but with such a small piece he wasn't 100% based on his post above. I guess as I move along on the prep, although I don't think there is much left that I'm qualified or have the proper tooling for I may just bring it to the museum. Thanks for the insights into this article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 I stand corrected it's Helderberg Limestone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now