kurdelmb Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I found this in a newly created quarry about the middle of the Elgin member, Maquoketa formation, upper Ordovician of Fayette County Iowa last week. I'm thinking (judging from the little indentations on what I think is a cephalon) that this is some sort of Bumastoides?? I have never found one and it seems a fair bit larger (45mm x 35mm) than what the research that I have of this area indicates. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raggedy Man Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I can't say for sure. There's not much to go on here other than it has a general shape consistent with Bumastoides sp. Maybe @piranha will have a better take on this. ...I'm back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I'm not a specialist in trilobites, but if it is a Bumastoides, according to the location of the find and using as reference *,**,***, I would start the research of Illaenids at the point of Bumastoides beckeri (Slocom, 1913). Figs. 11-12 of * *Jesse R. Carlucci et al. A systematic revision of the Upper Ordovician trilobite genus Bumastoides (Illaenidae), with new species from Oklahoma, Virginia and Missouri.Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, Vol. 10, Issue 4, December 2012, 679–723. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257656692_A_systematic_revision_of_the_Upper_Ordovician_trilobite_genus_Bumastoides_Illaenidae_with_new_species_from_Oklahoma_Virginia_and_Missouri ** Slocom, A. W. 1913. New trilobites from the Maquoketa beds of Fayette County, Iowa. Field Museum of Natural History Geological Series, 4, 43–83. http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1179&context=igsar or https://ia600208.us.archive.org/18/items/newtrilobitesfro43sloc/newtrilobitesfro43sloc.pdf *** Walter, O. T. 1927. Trilobites of Iowa and some related Paleozoic forms. Iowa Geological Survey Annual Reports 1923 and 1924, 31, 1–388. http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1260&context=igsar I agree with Raggedy Man, so just wait for piranha's opinion. " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now