Jump to content

~3cm "worm" imprint in agatized petrified wood? Found in central Oregon- Clarno Formation.


Lexicon72

Recommended Posts

I came across this piece while searching for petrified wood a little over a month ago.  I've been reaching out to various professionals and universities, and while folks have found the specimen fascinating, no one has been able to offer much of an explanation as to how this could have occurred since the soft-bodied creature would have had to leave an imprint that survived the many-year silification of the wood.  Bore holes are apparently common in wood, but nothing with this level of texture/detail.  Some have proposed the idea that the imprint was left in sap or a fine "paste" made from pulp, which then hardened and when through cell-replacement along with the surrounding wood.  Others have proposed it could be the result of the tree growing in around a bone fragment, etc... 

 

Very curious to hear from those who have seen this sort of thing before!

 

I'm also excited to be making my first post as a FF community member. :)  Rock- and fossil-hunting are a new hobby for me, and I'm loving it!

2016-11-20 21.21.07 (1).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Fossil Forum.

 

A closer more detailed photo of the texture of the imprint with help us to ID.

 

Here is my theory. The imprint sort of looks like a piece of wood with a web of cracks from drying out or having been burned. Note the series of parallel grain impressions that parallel the long direction of the imprint. When the main piece of wood was silicified, the space between the wood and the adjacent dead and cracked wood was filled with chalcedony and/ or opal creating an exterior mold of the cracked wood. What you see as raised ridges in the imprinted wood is the filling of the cracks in the dead wood. 

 

You have a great piece of wood. I especially like the green color.

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice find. :dinothumb:

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick input!!  The theory that it was another piece of dried/burnt wood would certainly make sense, especially with the amount of volcanic activity in the area (literally in a valley surrounded by volcanic buttes).  My contact at the U of OR also speculated that it could have been from some kind of seed cone considering the consistency in the segmentation, though this wouldn't have really matched up with the time period of the Clarno Formation...

 

Here are a few more pics with a little more detail from several different angles.  This is just on my phone, so unfortunately I can't get too close and keep it in focus without the flash, which takes away some of the parallel line texturing in each cell/segment due to the glossy reflection.

 

The material itself is somewhat translucent, so pretty cool with a little backlight!

20161211_150704.jpg

20161211_150757.jpg

20161211_150843.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clearer picture. I have to change my story a little since the "imprint" appears to stick out and have a positive relief. The lighting in the first photo made the feature look like it was an impression with negative relief. I think that feature is a piece of petrified wood or bark that has been fractured. Perhaps the wood burned or decayed before the rest of the wood. The chalcedony/ opal that silicified the wood appears to fill some of the cracks of the feature. Silica likes to fill all the cracks and voids in the wood during petrification.

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the internal texture lines do stick out, the feature itself is definitely set into the piece of wood (~2.5-3mm at its deepest).  The edges are flush with the surface of the piece and are not raised.  Pictures are just never as good as the real thing! :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Often when wood is petrified the outside of the piece will develop a "rind" of mineralization that is coarser than the interior. I think this is a remnant of the rind that was inside a crack/grove in the wood's surface. when the wood broke (after fossilizing) it left the bottom of the grove/crack"s rind. There are other pieces of the rind visible in the pictures. Notice also that it follows the grain exposed in the areas around it that have the rind removed.

Tony

  • I found this Informative 2

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One possibility is this was an insect burrow that filled with chewed up pulp and waste that later was mineralized along with the wood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Al Dente said:

One possibility is this was an insect burrow that filled with chewed up pulp and waste that later was mineralized along with the wood.

 

I'm thinking something along those lines or perhaps a parasitic vine? It appears that the mineralized wood that surrounds the shape may have grown around an intruder? 

-Dave

__________________________________________________

Geologists on the whole are inconsistent drivers. When a roadcut presents itself, they tend to lurch and weave. To them, the roadcut is a portal, a fragment of a regional story, a proscenium arch that leads their imaginations into the earth and through the surrounding terrain. - John McPhee

If I'm going to drive safely, I can't do geology. - John McPhee

Check out my Blog for more fossils I've found: http://viewsofthemahantango.blogspot.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is some of the same mineral making up the segmented inclusion also visible in other cracks...(it appears so in your last images)?

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, ynot said:

Often when wood is petrified the outside of the piece will develop a "rind" of mineralization that is coarser than the interior. I think this is a remnant of the rind that was inside a crack/grove in the wood's surface. when the wood broke (after fossilizing) it left the bottom of the grove/crack"s rind. There are other pieces of the rind visible in the pictures. Notice also that it follows the grain exposed in the areas around it that have the rind removed.

Tony

Was tmaier the only one that read this?

 

Ynot

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JohnJ said:

Is some of the same mineral making up the segmented inclusion also visible in other cracks...(it appears so in your last images)?

 

Some of the same coloration shows where there are tiny gaps/scarring, but most obviously within a few small tube-like features on one side (rightmost if you are looking at the initial pic in the thread).  It's hard to tell from the pics below, but they run through the piece from one end to the other.

Picture2.png

Picture1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ynot said:

Often when wood is petrified the outside of the piece will develop a "rind" of mineralization that is coarser than the interior. I think this is a remnant of the rind that was inside a crack/grove in the wood's surface. when the wood broke (after fossilizing) it left the bottom of the grove/crack"s rind. There are other pieces of the rind visible in the pictures. Notice also that it follows the grain exposed in the areas around it that have the rind removed.

Tony

Definitely a possibility since the wood from the area can often show distinct bark textures as a rind.  Here's a pic of a larger ~20lb piece I pulled out of the same spot (had to really dig for it!), with a clear bark rind.  I haven't seen anything in the area with the same structured segmentation as the specimen in question here, but that doesn't mean it's not there.

Picture3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Al Dente said:

One possibility is this was an insect burrow that filled with chewed up pulp and waste that later was mineralized along with the wood.

Several others I've talked with in the paleontology community have proposed this as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...