Jump to content

Itty Bitty Oddballs and Lots of Them


Bone Daddy

Recommended Posts

I think #31 are bryozoans.

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/14/2017 at 2:09 PM, Bone Daddy said:

 

I often see these spines on the web as "bone needles", implying they are some kind of artifact. Did paleo-indians use these in such a manner, or is this just people looking for something that isn't there? I found one example that appeared to be sharpened on one end.

 

I would just label them as catfish fin spine.  It is illegal to keep any artifact you may find, even out-of-place material from the river, and having anything in your collection labeled as an artifact (unless you know for certain it is) could just potentially invite trouble.  

 

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure #2 is a partial and worn fish mouth plate.  Generally associated with a fish similar to a drum fish ?  They can be veeery small and some quite large. There have been many discussed and displayed on the fossil forum.

 

Black River Fossils - Micros

http://www.blackriverfossils.org/USA/Alabama/Andalusia/tabid/53/TripReports/3897/Default.aspx

IMG_1230 web.JPG

 

post-12530-0-17383400-1374983712.jpg

 

Cheers,

Brett

 

 

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FossilDAWG said:

I would just label them as catfish fin spine.  It is illegal to keep any artifact you may find, even out-of-place material from the river, and having anything in your collection labeled as an artifact (unless you know for certain it is) could just potentially invite trouble.  

 

Don

I would state it was found on private property.....which in this case, it was. :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/14/2017 at 6:00 PM, fifbrindacier said:

I also think #29 is a cetacean tooth and maybe #30 also, but it would be better if you showed us both the ends of it.

I'll snap some better photos of these and post them. :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for those pics, but i think i didn't expressed clearly myself, a problem of vocabulary without doubt. In fact what i was speaking about photos of both ends (circled in red) taken from above. Because those surfaces, mostly the chewing one, are determinant for a good identification.:)

teeth-2.thumb.jpg.dac3fa84b2c1f37a4e2f3cd7a6bc793e.jpg

 

Like for example with one of my tooth :

P2031284.JPG

 

The chewing surface :

P1170001.JPG

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your pics, it confirms they are both cetacean, so i'll go with @ynot.

  • I found this Informative 1

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...