Ludwigia Posted February 6, 2017 Author Share Posted February 6, 2017 15 hours ago, Canadawest said: A whole bunch of stuff can happen. What minerals are washing through the deposits, etc. Carbonates, calcite...? One weird thing that happens when there are distinct sedimentary layers is that minerals of young layers of fossils can seep into underlying older layers. This can 'mess up' trying to age material unless the actual index foseils are known. There can be a bit of a tension between old paleontologists that study fossils and geologists that use chemical analysis in aging deposits. Of course . Or pyrit or opal or silica, or various ores, etc. can also replace. That's an interesting aspect you mention at the end. Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 something recent on mineralogical-taphonomic biases(or lack of them): Jordan_015-Let.pdf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFOOLEY Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Figure 2. in this article... Aragonitic rostra of the Turonian belemnitid Goniocamax.pdf ...has some electron images that may be helpful to you. 1 "I am glad I shall never be young without wild country to be young in. Of what avail are forty freedoms without a blank spot on the map?" ~Aldo Leopold (1887-1948) New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted February 7, 2017 Author Share Posted February 7, 2017 Thanks, guys. Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now