Jump to content

dialout

Recommended Posts

Found this partial while fishing just south of Lake erie. Had a hard time focusing the camera but it appears to taper to a point. Looking at some other pics I was thinking this is possibly a partial snake? 

20170221_102807.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's about 2.5 inches long and is broken off on the right side of the pic, with the tapering end obviously being on the left. 

2017-02-21 13.04.09.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks similar to the trace fossil (ichnofossil) Cruziana.

Cruziana is a trace left by trilobites travelling on the ocean floor. 

Very cool. 

Regards,

 

58ac815dd1fa2_2017-02-2113_04_09.jpg.8005eb3e81f576ac84fabdb634836ec2.jpg

 

 

  • I found this Informative 7

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea was just looking at that after google searching ichnofossil. Didn't know what that was...noob here 

 

 

First find of anything other than fern leaves. 

 

Super fast replies too much appreciated 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow that is COOL!

I do not have any trilobite swim marks, but I do have a fish swim mark from the Green River Formation!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FossilDudeCO said:

Wow that is COOL!

I do not have any trilobite swim marks, but I do have a fish swim mark from the Green River Formation!

 

I'd love to see a picture of your Undichna, Blake. 

I'm sure others would, too. :) 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do't think that's from a trilobite, but rather a terrestrial arthropod, likely a millipede type insect. You said you've found fern fossils, so does this piece come from that same area?

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, EMP said:

I do't think that's from a trilobite, but rather a terrestrial arthropod, likely a millipede type insect. You said you've found fern fossils, so does this piece come from that same area?

I agree with this, it just looks the millipede tracks I have seen.

Tony

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure.... :unsure: 

 

Compare this millipede trackway

 

m-3901.jpg

From:  http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/article/h-1371

 

With this trilobite (Cruziana) trackway: 

 

triloichno.jpg

 

From:  http://www.trilobites.info/trace.htm

 

The OP's item looks more like the Cruziana, to my eye.  

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

The OP's item looks more like the Cruziana, to my eye.  

I have to disagree with this. the Cruziana track looks like a brushed row, where the other tracks (OP's and Yours) look more like a row of divits.

The millipede track is also sets of divots where the trilobite track lacks any "sets" in its layout.

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd actually like to see a more detailed, better lit photo. 

I'd also like to know where exactly it was found - the stratigraphy would be helpful in this instance. 

If it was found in an area of Pennsylvanian aged rocks, I would lean towards millipede. 

If Devonian, I would lean toward trilobite. 

 

More Cruziana images:

 

cruziana-1.jpg           pft795b.JPG       pft793c.JPG

 

 

triloichno.jpg          58ac815dd1fa2_2017-02-2113_04_09.jpg.8005eb3e81f576ac84fabdb634836ec2.jpg    Millipede:m-3901.jpg

 

 

 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

More Cruziana images:

cruziana-1.jpg pft795b.JPG pft793c.JPG

 

 

None of the images in this thread show the typical scratch marks associated with Cruziana.

 

Cruziana figures from:

 

Mángano, M.G., & Buatois, L.A., eds. (2016)
The trace-fossil record of major evolutionary events: Precambrian and Paleozoic
Springer Scientific Publishing - Topics in Geobiology, 39:1-358

 

IMG.thumb.jpg.2f7b87a37f25389bb497c3167b66802d.jpg

 

  • I found this Informative 1

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, piranha said:

 

 

None of the images in this thread show the typical scratch marks associated with Cruziana.

 

 

 

This one isn't Cruziana , with a Rusophycus at the end? :headscratch:

 

 

triloichno.jpg

 

I think that website should be changed, then. <_< 

 

Well, I defer to your extensive knowledge on this, Scott. :mellow: 

Thanks for chiming in. :) 


I would still like to see better pictures of the OP's trace fossil.

 

 

 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello everyone!

 

This thread reminded me that I have a specimen that I collected last summer (Humber River in Toronto, Georgian Bay Formation, Upper Ordovician) that someone suggested might be a trace fossil made by a trilobite, but I'd like to get other peoples' input on it, too - please find the photos below:

 

58acbf7965091_HumberRiverFossil2dry.JPG.e015a403be76e8c418bd4a304ac19090.JPG58acbf7f8442e_HumberRiverFossil2wet.JPG.0abe378f48a085d2e6a7b6d879834733.JPG

 

@piranha and others, what do you think?

 

Thanks so much!

 

Monica

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

This one isn't Cruziana , with a Rusophycus at the end? :headscratch:

triloichno.jpg

 

 

I was actually commenting on the other images, not this obvious example from: http://www.trilobites.info.

With the exception of this one, the other images in this thread do not appear to match well with Cruziana.  

Higher resolution photos would be helpful.

 

 

  • I found this Informative 1

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key question to me is where the fossil was found. The land just south of Lake Erie is too general of a statement. Land to the west under water, Silurian, no millipedes.  Land to the east, a possibility.

 

1909GeolMap_Big.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was somewhere around Fairview or Girard had been hiking the creeks all day. So that would be about 10-15 miles or so south west of the city of Erie. More west than south I was probably only a mile or so from the lake itself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the area is Devonian to me: 

 

b7da93346c1133b83427813284461013.jpg  

 

 

Erie.jpg

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...