Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, is this a correct identification? Or is it Otozamites gramineus? Found at Runswick Bay.

 

 

k-IMG_6622.JPG

k-IMG_6623.JPG

k-IMG_6625.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites
Fossildude19

Welcome to the Forum. :) 

 

Hmm. I thought Runswick Bay was a marine deposit.   :headscratch: Not that that precludes plants from being found there, it's just a bit unusual.  

It definitely looks like some species of Otozamites, but I don't know enough about the plant fossils there to hazard a guess. 

 

I find Early Jurassic Otozamites latior, and Otozamites brevifolis here in Connecticut. It looks similar, except for the rachis - the fossils I find are compressed carbonized films. 
Your specimen has a rather inflated, 3 dimensional rachis. 

Maybe some experts from the area will weigh in. 
Thanks for posting this - it's a lovely fossil.    :wub: 

Regards,

 

EDIT: I see that a bit south of there, Hayburn Wyke  is known for their plant fossils. 
# species of Otozamites,  ( O. graphicus, O. gramineus, and O. tenuatus )   and  Zamites gigas are known from there. 

The Otozamites are rare from there, but, ... Zamites gigas is common. 

 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a couple of different plants present.  Otozamites on the left, and the one on the right appears to be Pterophyllum.

 

This excellent monograph will help you determine which species.

 

Harris, T.M. (1969)

The Yorkshire Jurassic Flora. III. Bennettitales.

British Museum Natural History, 3:1-186   LINK

 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...