Jump to content

Ordovician Cephalopods


AHoffman

Recommended Posts

As I wade through the boxes of fossils I collected as a kid and try to make heads or tails of what everything is, where it was collected, and whether it is worth keeping or giving away, I've hit a road block with cephalopods. It seems cephalopod identification hinges largely on internal features that are not always accessible/preserved. I'm trying to figure out what I can and cannot identify and also what I am trying to look for. I've got two examples below; the smaller one is from Ripley County Indiana and is either from the Liberty or Waynesville Formation (I believe) of the Richmondian stage. Looking at it, I was thinking the small circle visible on both the anterior and posterior end is the siphuncle. If this is true, it looks to be ventral which would make this Cameroceras? Am I on the right track and can I get it down to species possibly? The second, larger fossil is from Franklin County Indiana and is also from either the Waynesville or Liberty Formations of the Richmondian. Based on the shape, it seems like this is an Oncocerid cephalopod and I'm torn between Diestoceras and Beloitoceras. Once again, am I in the right ballpark and can this be narrowed down any more given the condition of the fossils? I'm interesting in learning what features everyone is looking at in identifying cephalopods and what kind of preservation is needed to get to at least the genus level so I can apply the approach my other cephalopod fossils.

Thanks for any help you can provide!
-Andrew

IMG_1901.JPG

IMG_1902.JPG

IMG_1903.JPG

IMG_1904.JPG

IMG_1906.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I can't really help with a pinpoint ID, thank you for sharing these with us. And welcome back, by the way! These are quite nice specimens.

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a first suggestion:familiarize yourself with the ouput of Sven Stridsberg and Bjorn Kroger

edit: if you hadn't done that already

  • I found this Informative 1

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or you can trust yours truly

Great plates in this one,BTW

Unless i'm very much mistaken,several Beloitoceras discussed in that paper

there's also USGS paper 1066,of course,probably already in Fruitbat's

excellent preservation of septal necks would be a prerequisite,methinks

  • I found this Informative 2

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If I compare this specimen with those from R. C. Frey, 1995, I think it looks more like Diestoceras rather than Beloitoceras.

 

IMG_1904.JPG.0cf86c81c267072088a012987a445396.thumb.JPG.abc1b507d43a6bd4ab1fb23b8b6df2c4.JPGIMG_1906.JPG.3158a34c13c7bc622ef272314946ce26.thumb.JPG.0603b6aa357d6cf249fe4449f3562aa9.JPG

aselection_2.thumb.jpg.e345166ff1c6d0b3d41d553d028acc4e.jpgaselection_1.thumb.jpg.446ee9e090715f60ef903100043a5608.jpg

aselection_4.thumb.jpg.a08829290d550798d65b513be06bbebb.jpgaselection_3.thumb.jpg.c70286adcae4dde55d07b415565fc450.jpg

 

  • I found this Informative 1

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all, for the help!

Those references will definitely help me out. Based on the figures, Diestoceras certainly does look like the closer of the two.

 

Is there a way to cut one of these in half to actually examine the siphuncle and septal neck? Would those features even be preserved in these kind of fossils?

 

-Andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry can i have one of u smart people look at my stuff please i think i got some cool things sorry didnt know how to go about this

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jessevanhout said:

sorry can i have one of u smart people look at my stuff please i think i got some cool things sorry didnt know how to go about this

 

 

Go to the top of this page and click "Start new topic". :)

 

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...