Jump to content

Help identify fossil found in NE Iowa please


Irishgal44

Recommended Posts

My daughter found this in a dry creek bed in NE Iowa.   Does anyone have an idea of what it could be?  It's about 2.5 inches wide. 

 Any input would be greatly appreciated!

Screenshot_20170530-224249.png

Another picture...

Screenshot_20170530-224240.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may need some preparation. I can see it being a piece of gastropod shell, but I see why the texture may be a problem. 

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, looks like a bone to me, but further prep is required. 

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This area almost looks like Halysites coral to me.  I think her original image shows it better.  IMG_1358.thumb.PNG.caaea06d23cefb606dba7d528198a9e7.PNG

Finding my way through life; one fossil at a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone!!!  And thanks for the welcome!  I will take a couple more pictures when I get home from work.  :)

 

Maria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting find. Have seen many water worn slabs from streams in NE Iowa that have a similar appearance. Which stream?  May help rule out some possibilities. Can likely rule out bone and turtle beak in that NE Iowa is Cambrian through Devonian. Chert is a possibility as chert exists in many layers locally. However, I do not usually find chert in the type of rock (very fine layering) you present here today.  As for Halysites coral, yes it is an uncommon find for the area. But the Karst topography in the area leads me to believe it is a geologic addition to the specimen. Now that I have argued against many of the posted possibilities, I wish I could ID it for you. I lean toward Rockwood's suggestion if push came to shove.

 

mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thick end of a bivalve or brachiopod with the thinner, away from the hinge, portion eroded away? Broken gastropod may fit better as Rockwood suggests. I don't recall it in paleozoic rocks but the halysites looking thing resembles cliona, a boring sponge. Perhaps there's a paleozoic equivalent. All of this is guessing of course. Am basing my guesses on experience with resistant shells weathering from limestone like this.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cropped selection from your image magnified at 8x with pixel corrections (the best I can get) looks like having some encrusting, branching bryozoan (s), maybe something similar in form to Arachnidium or Pierrella, maybe from a different geological time. Hard to tell. High resolution images of the mentioned areas are needed for a confident ID.

 

59301ce36a79f_Screenshot_20170530-224240.png.020391005c7ffbec5092bf2d9b08f47d-81.thumb.png.1e458f949106a1f4319fab00f277cc48.png59301cee4a96a_IMG_20170531_202434.jpg.ca2be4e3a44659dc5539aa1f8973ac8e-81.thumb.jpg.06ab1f4ab4ed5195151fb5378c42f307.jpg

 

The specimen in question looks to be shell material (possibly brachiopod or bivalve), as it was suggested before.

 

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abyssunder,Corynotrypa a possibility?

The branching pattern looks kinda bryozoan to me

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be that, why not? The resemblance might be good and the geological age also.

Here is an example of Corynotrypa from the Ordovician of northern Kentucky, courtesy of Mark A. Wilson:

 

OrdovicianEdrio.jpg.baf118e2c96a6670c5600afe60690239.jpg

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

confusion with Halysitidae and/or Catenipora seems a given!:P

Edit:the pattern we see here is not conacatenid,so what i just said might not be true

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As mentioned earlier, the pattern is likely a carbonate deposition on the fossil, a very common occurrence in our area due to the Karst topography. Many slabs have both fossils and "cave like" depositions on them. It used to confuse me often, until someone explained this to me. Bryozoan could be a possibility, but pictures with much better resolution would be needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone!  Unfortunately my camera isn't the best.  I need to upgrade now that I've found this amazing community of like minded people.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Irishgal!

 

I see a lot of these types of "fossils" that are on top of a worn stone. Very hard to say for sure, I go with a contorted bryozoan, but heck, what do I know.  :-)

 

PDF BCF ID Sheet.pdf

 

Here is a PDF of my Ordovician ID sheet that will help you, or I have jpegs on my fossil adventure blog free for the downloading.

 

Minnbuckeye is the best there is around here for IDing fossils. I would go with whatever he says. 

 

Holler at me sometime and we will go fossil hunting together.

 

Bev  :-)

The more I learn, I realize the less I know.

:wacko:
 
 

Go to my

Gallery for images of Fossil Jewelry, Sculpture & Crafts
 

Pinned Posts:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...