Jump to content

More waynesboro trace fossils?


Miocene_Mason

Recommended Posts

Okay on my recent and probably last visit to Waynesboro, I found two more possible fossils. The first one I believe to be a burrow just like the last one. The second I think is either the same or just a sediment filled crack, as it seems another younger deposit is over it (it looks like a river from the conglomerate which has pebbles of this maroon shale in it). I think it's waynesboro formation chewsville member, Cambrian in age. The site is pretty unfossiliferous. If anyone wants to check it's by the McDonald's.

IMG_1565.JPG

IMG_1567.JPG

IMG_1566.JPG

IMG_1568.JPG

IMG_1569.JPG

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_1570.JPG

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with the formations, but I'm unconvinced these are fossils. The bottom one appears to be where larger mineral crystals have been exposed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering that the angle between each of the branches and the curved main ax is varying, I think plant material could be ruled out. The other two possibilities might be septarian propagation cracks ( with mineral veins) and trace fossils (without mineral veins). I'm leaning toward the first.

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Plax I guess there is a chance, but this is not the right color and texture. I assume you mean Newark group (Gettysburg or new oxford) and I have collected in those before and they are different. The reason I thought waynesboro formation was 1) its in waynesboro and 2) it fits rather nicely with the chewsville members description of "Maroon shale". This is all however from online searching and may be incorrect, but my best guess is waynesboro formation. Another layer does lie above it that seems to be river sediment shale, what formation or age I couldn't tell you though.

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have it right WhodamanHD. Was just curious because I had seen Triassic rocks that looked similar and my limited Cambrian experience is in the Kinzers. Interesting rocks and a possibility of at least fragments of trilobites if the old papers I googled are any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...