Jump to content

mikecable

Recommended Posts

Can we get a few more pictures? 

 

Marc

Website: https://www.instagram.com/paleo_archives/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

“It is by no means an irrational fancy that, in a future existence, we shall look upon what we think our present existence, as a dream.”

Edgar Allan Poe

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RJB said:

I dont know what it is, but it is not squid beak.

 

RB 

 

Agreed, this item bears no similarities to the squid beaks on Google Images 

 

Marc

 

------

 

P.S.   Here's a squid beak:

ace55b24eded9dbaec6b46ecd999776e--squid-beak-colossal-squid.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1

Website: https://www.instagram.com/paleo_archives/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

“It is by no means an irrational fancy that, in a future existence, we shall look upon what we think our present existence, as a dream.”

Edgar Allan Poe

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has the appearance of Belosaepia but the tube running across it makes me think it isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tube is what is throwing me as well. It almost looks man made--like a piece of PVC pipe.  But everything else about it screams fossil, including the bits of the interior structure that are visible. Most of my Whiskey Bridge finds are fairly easy to identify.  But I keep going back to Belosaepia. For lack of any other thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps a small segment of Dentalium scaphalopod  in conjunction with a cuttlefish beak? As ynot suggests. Lots of Dentalium in the mix.

 

scaphopod-dentalium-fossil-eocene-stone-city-formation-brazos-river-texas-2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This item appears to be the umbo (hinge) of a clamshell, and the calcareous tube of a tube-worm, cemented together with an algal holdfast or a similar encrusting organism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MarcusFossils said:

 

Agreed, this item bears no similarities to the squid beaks on Google Images 

 

Marc

 

------

 

P.S.   Here's a squid beak:

ace55b24eded9dbaec6b46ecd999776e--squid-beak-colossal-squid.jpg

 

Just a friendly cephalopod anatomy fyi: That google photo has the beak upside-down.

 

Below is a Dosidicus gigas beak for comparison, with the correct orientation.  The smaller beak actually goes on top.

 

 

IMG_4517.JPG

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, BobWill said:

Crushed/burned  PVC joint in resin? See if it burns.

That was my thought, too.  But it seems to be attached to something else that I can't make out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tube has an inner diameter of only about 0.5 mm.  I've never seen PVC that small.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another guess would be a gastropod fragment, the siphonal canal part which goes to the aperture.

 

59497c8214d9b_Gastrapodmorphology.jpg.710b1a7560211f7e90bcc3df6143ba99.jpg

  • I found this Informative 3

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can't let this thing kick us around like this! How about some end views? Can you tell anything about the yellow (orange?) coating? Is it a familiar mineral? Any similar colored rocks seen where you found it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes 3-4 mm

Quote

 

abyssunder has it.  The shot taken from the end held the secret. Siphonal canal fragment of a gastropod cemented together with a scaphopod fragment.  A bit disappointed, but I had fun with it.  Thanks for all the help.

WIN_20170621_16_24_18_Pro.jpg

WIN_20170621_16_23_28_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like two pieces of plastic pipe or tubing epoxied together.  What is the white material made of?  can you do a hardness test with  a scribe to see if its soft like plastic, or hard like calcite?  That would be helpful.  Also, some acetic acid on the components will help illuminate thier composition if they bubble.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Arizona Chris

Paleo Web Site:  http://schursastrophotography.com/fossiladventures.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Already been run through mild acetic acid for cleaning.  Too small to do a hardness test without destroying it.  Less than three mm in length. Definitely fossiliferous.  Just not a cuttlefish beak.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost looks like an otolith is trapped inside the gastropod fragment.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...