Jump to content

FranzBernhard

Recommended Posts

Hello!

 

I am currently looking for the rudists of the Upper Cretaceous Gosau basin of Kainach, Styria, Austria, around St. Bartholomae. So far, I have found one determinable specimen. I think, it could be Vaccinites vesiculosus (Woodward 1855). From this area, beside other rudists, Hippurites styriacus Hilber 1902, Hippurites carinthiacus Redlich 1899 and Hippirutes oppeli santoniensis Kühn 1954 are described in the literature, which seem to be all synonyms of V. vesiculosus, according to various sources.

 

The first photo shows the outer surface of the specimen, which is not very distinctive. Height of the specimen is 13 cm, maximum diameter about 7 cm. A saw cut is indicated by a green arrow. The second picture shows the two polished, cut surfaces of the "rock". The diamater of the large rudist is 7 cm, it seems to be intergrown with a Radiolites sp. and there is also a small Hippurites sp. nearby. The third picture is an enlargement of the V. vesiculosus in question.

 

What do you think, could my determination as V. v. be correct?

 

Thank you very much for your help!
Franz Bernhard

VaccinitesVesiculosus_aussen_Punkt5_mitPfeil.jpg

Picture 2

VaccinitesVesiculosus_reduz_Punkt5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Franz Bernhard is an older member of TFF... It's just a name and location  coincidence, or maybe Forum Name change from Bernhard ? :)

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I lost the access to my usual email-adress, so a new registration with a new email-adress was neccessary...

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doushantou,

thank you very much!

 

I have the paper of Kaumanns and also that of Zittel (But did not have a close look at the last one).

 

Hmm, V. dilatatus (Defrance 1821) is also very similar to V. vesiculosus and V. oppeli santoniensis, thanks for the hint! They are all (still) regarded as distinct species.

 

What to you think?

 

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

I lost the access to my usual email-adress, so a new registration with a new email-adress was neccessary...

Franz Bernhard

 

Franz, 

I've merged your old account with the new one. :) 

Let me know if you have any issues. 

Regards, 

Tim

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tim,

thank you very much for merging my accounts! Everything is ok!

Thanks!
Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really hard to identify to the species level without a strong revision of the late Cretaceous rudist of your region. Originally designated names could be outdated or could be wrong. I propose the Pseudovaccinites sp. labeling as a temporal assign, although I'm not a specialist in this domain.

 

You made a good work sectioning transversely the lower valve of the rudist in question, Frantz. That is necessary for a correct ID. :)

 

  • I found this Informative 1

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

abyssunder,

thank you very much for your comment! Yes, the situation is really confusing. Attached there is a list of the rudist species mentioned from the Gosau basin of Kainach, Styria, Austria (Santon-Campan) in various local literature. And two excerpts from recent papers concerning this subject in Croatia with quite similar rudists. Confusing, indeed!

 

Btw, several authors state, that the rudist faunas of Kainach (Styria) and Wietersdorf (Carinthia) has closer similarities to the rudist faunas of southeast Europe than to the faunas of the inneralpine Gosau basins (eg. Rußbach, Gams, Brandenberg etc.).

 

How can I distinguish between genus Vaccinites and genus Pseudovaccinites? Have not found anything usefull yet.

 

Thanks again!
Franz Bernhard

Rudists_Kainach_Literature.jpg

Moro_2004.jpg

Moro_2010.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you should just call it Vaccinates sp. and leave it at that. At least you know that that's correct. Like Abyssunder indicates, these Rudists need a revision. It's probably just as confusing for the "experts".

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doushantou,

thank you very much for your efforts, I appreciate them greatly!

 

Ludwigia,

yes, I can call them Vaccinites sp. But I am interested in oppinions if I can go deeper. For example, I like the concept of "species groups" of Moro. But I don´t know if that is something "real". However, it looks possibly helpfull.

 

Thanks to all!
Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just to show off another V.v. from the same area, found 8. July 2017. Its only a fragment, but its better preserved then the first one. Diameter about 7.5 cm, arrows point to L- and P1-pillar on the weathered surface.

Franz Bernhard

Vaccinites_15_roh_reduz.jpg

Vaccinites_15_reduz.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you very much, abyssunder,

I have this ref. already.

Yes, it is practically the same geological situation and age here in St. Bartholomä.

In the meantime, I have found all the species also known from Krappfeld (H. colliciatus, H. heritschi (= H. nabresinensis), V. ultimus (= V. alpinus)) myself here in St. Bartholomä.

Thanks again!
Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good question, Ludwigia!

 

According to the database of Steuber, H. tirolicus is valid:

http://www.paleotax.de/rudists/s129.htm

 

But it was never mentioned from Krappfeld gosau in Carinthia or Kainach gosau in Styria.

 

Btw, here is a summary of my investigations in the St. Bartholomä-Formation of the Kainach Gosau (in german):

https://franzbernhard.lima-city.de/SanktBartholomae.html

 

Franz Bernhard

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/23/2017 at 2:10 PM, FranzBernhard said:

How can I distinguish between genus Vaccinites and genus Pseudovaccinites? Have not found anything usefull yet.

 

 

The answer to your question is here:

 

selection_1.thumb.jpg.1426111fe27432e7f19229934987ed6d.jpgselection_2.thumb.jpg.1ddec92ffa5d3e407620a3b9d8135d63.jpg

 

excerpt from L. T. García. 2015. Rudistas (Hippuritida, Bivalvia) del Cenomaniense-Coniaciense (Cretácico superior) del Pirineo meridional-central. Paleontología y bioestratigrafía. Tesis Doctoral.

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...