Jump to content

Plant or animal ?


Rocky Stoner

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, me again ... :)

Went back to the shale pit to "crack a few" in search of something new, well, you know what I mean.

There were several fossils like the one pictured. Some appeared to be straight across the bottom like a brachiopod but could have looked that way due to the break in the split.

Can you tell if this is plant or animal ?

I searched the regular sources and found little (no) relatively info.

Next time there, I'll try to get better examples.

Thanks again,

:)

 

IMG_9995.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Looks like a brachipod but there are bivalves such as Dunbarella that are common in shale that can resemble brachiopods. Need a complete hinge line/umbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One other detail that is not evident in the single (sorry) photo, these are very near to absolutely flat. Wouldn't be much room inside for brachipopd innards.

I suppose they could have been flattened somehow if in fact they are brachiopods ?

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some brachiopods could be fairly svelte, but in this case it is a question of the preservation that crushes them flat. Although not a hard and fast rule, generally speaking fossils that appear in highly compressed fissile shale tend to be more likely crushed, while those preserved in limestone tend to be a bit more robust.

  • I found this Informative 1

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, westcoast said:

 Looks like a brachipod but there are bivalves such as Dunbarella that are common in shale that can resemble brachiopods. Need a complete hinge line/umbo.

Image search looks very similar, THANKS for the hit !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rocky Stoner said:

One other detail that is not evident in the single (sorry) photo, these are very near to absolutely flat. Wouldn't be much room inside for brachipopd innards.

I suppose they could have been flattened somehow if in fact they are brachiopods ?

Thanks.

Yes, just as @Kane said if you look around some brachiopods can have a quite thin shape and profile but you also have to consider that this shale is a sedimentary deposit of mud that has been compressed and created under enormous pressure.  It is not uncommon for fossils in shale to be distorted heavily or compressed and essentially 'squished' under all of that weight.

 

Cheers,

Brett

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Rocky Stoner said:

One other detail that is not evident in the single (sorry) photo, these are very near to absolutely flat. Wouldn't be much room inside for brachipopd innards.

I suppose they could have been flattened somehow if in fact they are brachiopods ?

Thanks.

Here is a nice explanation of the process of specifically strain on the rock. Your shale might be more on the compaction side but still the same forces are involved. 

http://hudsonvalleygeologist.blogspot.com/2013/07/strained-by-stress.html

 

and a distorted trilo to boot ....

TriloDistorted.gif.ee6f87ae3c7558f83cc61525418c6e6e.gif

 

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compare with: Protoleptostrophia perplana

 

IMG.thumb.jpg.dfea141c9a40cbc069252b561e7f58e6.jpg

 

figure from:

 

Ellison, R.L. (1965)
Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Mahantango Formation in south-central Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania Geological Survey, Fourth Series, Bulletin G48:1-298  PDF LINK

  • I found this Informative 2

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went back to the "pit" to look for more examples and the ones I'd seen earlier had been overexposed to the sun and disintegrated.

So I popped out a few fresh chunks and found several rather quickly, these three exhibiting the best views of the hinge-line/umbo.

I suppose the pressure would also have contributed by dilation making them thinner than a leaf.

Learned a bit today ... as I do everyday here, thanks !

(and a picture of the "pit" for kicks)

IMG_0001.JPG

IMG_0002.JPG

IMG_0003.JPG

IMG_0004.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks like a Miss. brachiopod, Orthotetes sp.

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen

No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go.

" I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes

"can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds me of protostropholepta (and other strophomenids) sorry to muddy the water further....

I've found these in the mahantango btw

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WhodamanHD said:

Reminds me of protostropholepta (and other strophomenids) sorry to muddy the water further....

I've found these in the mahantango btw

Interesting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strophomenida

quote ... "Typically the dorsal valve was either concave or flat, though occasionally it was convex; the ventral valve was convex."

One flat valve, cool.

Also, in this matrix there are small brachiopods and crinoid segments that are not distorted in the least.

 

Thanks.

... and the crinoid posted earlier was just inches away from these valves and shows now deformation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Beautiful  brachiopods. Quite large too. Another couple of interiors and exteriors of both valves and ID should get a bit clearer..but Protoleptostrophia looking good right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, piranha said:

Compare with: Protoleptostrophia perplana

 

49 minutes ago, WhodamanHD said:

Reminds me of protostropholepta ....

 

Can I assume these are intended to be one in the same ?

(the latter returns nothing from a search)

Thanks !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this is the most interesting part of a story. Can somebody explain that? Recovering of predation?

 

IMG_0001.JPG.052124d1e76d8f9e4bad834fd13aef74.thumb.JPG.2f055e013590b722c0daadc528d6c84f.JPG

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rocky Stoner said:

 

 

Can I assume these are intended to be one in the same ?

(the latter returns nothing from a search)

Thanks !

Yeah, wasnt sure of the spelling and I didn't see that comment, so in hindsight I agree with piranha!

3 hours ago, abyssunder said:

Maybe this is the most interesting part of a story. Can somebody explain that? Recovering of predation?

 

IMG_0001.JPG.052124d1e76d8f9e4bad834fd13aef74.thumb.JPG.2f055e013590b722c0daadc528d6c84f.JPG

Maybe just intraspecies variation? The lines do tend to wiggle as they get bigger I've observed.

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...