ahlung62 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I purchased the following fish plate from the Warfield Fish Quarry gift shop while on a family fossil fish dig many years ago. It looks to be a mid-sized diplomystus (about 8 inches long) swallowing a knightia. The unusual thing about this situation is that the knightia seems to have been caught tail-first!? I have never seen this before... I would like some expert opinions on whether this is an unusual aspiration or if it's just a mega coincidence where two fishes happen to be preserved overlapped in just the right position to appear that way. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 This is really a task best undertaken through a lens, but the fact that diplos are thought to be surface feeders combined with the tail first thing makes me vote coincidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 @FossilDudeCO Whats ya thoughts, Blake? "Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe" - Saint Augustine"Those who can not see past their own nose deserve our pity more than anything else." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Mud Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I think this is a coincidence. The mouth of the Diplomystus doesn't appear to be extended enough to accommodate the Knightia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I think it may be coincidental, as well. It looks like the mouth bones are missing or disarticulated on the Diplomystus. Regards, Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miocene_Mason Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I'm guessing coincidental as well, it's not incredibly unlikely two fish fall on top of each other. “...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin Happy hunting, Mason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDudeCO Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 @ahlung62 Can you snap me a close up picture of the top half. A little more detail can go a long way here. I am leaning towards real aspiration. This is not a high quality preservation, but is typical of what you see from the Warfield Quarry. This would be strange that the Knightia was swallowed tail first. I have seen it before though. Only one other time. It has all the right marking, but those close up photos will tell me which fish is on top or in the middle. @Rockwood Diplomystus are the most common fish to be found choking on another fish! Think of them as ambush predators, striking from underneath. This could be the result of a missed or late strike. @Ash Thanks for the tag, it is a cool piece! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDudeCO Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Thanks @Fossildude19! That helps a bit, I like the blue light filter? This one may be tough as I can see that the prep job was a little strange. Whoever prepped this piece, prepped through the Diplo to make the Knightia more visible. Not really the best way to prove an Aspiration. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Blake, @FossilDudeCO The free photo editor I use (Photoscape) has a "Reverse Black and White" option. With colored pictures, it ends up looking a bit like a black light exposure. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 38 minutes ago, FossilDudeCO said: Think of them as ambush predators, striking from underneath I realized (too late) that their size would eventually make this the case. The ones in question at the time it was explained to me were small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I have a hard time trying to realize why someone would go through the diplo to prep out th eKnightia tail? Seems very odd, but looks to me like an aspiration? hard to tell. RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDudeCO Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 8 minutes ago, RJB said: I have a hard time trying to realize why someone would go through the diplo to prep out th eKnightia tail? Seems very odd, but looks to me like an aspiration? hard to tell. RB My best guess is that the tail was barely visible in that disarticulated mess and they wanted to show it better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted August 14, 2017 Share Posted August 14, 2017 Im not sure anymore. The more I look at it the more I think its not an aspiration. RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahlung62 Posted August 15, 2017 Author Share Posted August 15, 2017 Here's a couple of close-ups of the head area. This specimen is currently on display in a Natural History Exhibit I've set up at Leeward Community College where I work ande I had to wait until today to retrieve it for the photos. I've looked at the piece under magnification, and it looks like the diplomystus is missing some pieces around the mouth/jaw area -- not sure if it was due to the fossilization process or poor prep. Thank you to everyone contributing to this discussion -- you've given me valuable insight and fruit for thought. Roger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted August 15, 2017 Share Posted August 15, 2017 I don't see anything that looks like part of the larger fish under the tail. Wouldn't that be almost a necessity to prove aspiration ? The diplo wouldn't have swallowed a mouth full of mud with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now