Jump to content

upper ordovician orthocone nautiloid?


ottawafossil

Recommended Posts

Hi, I found this fossil a few years ago on the shoreline of lake ontario right in the city of Kingston Ontario. I believe the exposures here are upper Ordovician age limestone (Gull River formation) however there may have been fill brought in from elsewhere to stabilize the shoreline so this fossil may not be exactly local. It looks to have a siphuncle (acentral) and sutures (relatively close together) so I thought it appeared to be some type of orthocone nautiloid of some type. Based on Bill Hessin's field guide "South Central Ontario Fossils" I thought i might be Gonioceras anceps or Actinoceras but I really don't know. The pics here are not great, but hopefully someone has some ideas. 

Thanks

IMG_6497 (1).jpg

IMG_6494 (1).jpg

IMG_6500 (1).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to help out our nautiloid experts, could you post a picture of the outside of the specimen showing the annulations/striations? Those can really help in pinpointing an ID. :) 

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actinocerids have a very large siphuncle that expands within each cameral chamber so it looks like a series of fat discs.  In addition both the siphuncle and the adjacent parts of the camerae are filled with deposits, and the siphuncle lies in direct contact with the outer shell, so that part of the shell was weighted down and lay in contact with the sea floor.  Also Gonioceras was quite flattened, and the camerae were bent sharply back towards the the apex (pointy end).  These features are not evident in your specimen.  Rather, as far as I can tell from the photos, the siphuncle is linear (not expanded within the camerae) and lacks deposits so it is mostly filled with sediment.  That suggests that your specimen is more likely to be an endocerid.  Endoceras is one of the more common nautiloids in the Gull River, and is the best candidate ID in my opinion.

 

Don C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can recommend:

edit: i just realized something:this might look like I endorse W*l*y:it's freely available,or i wouldn't post it

oncogaulthauternepost-10158-0-56304000-1441096788_thumb.jpg

oncogaulthauternepost-10158-0-56304000-1441096788_thumb.jpg

bercofimages.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...