Jump to content

Cornuella, a very rare ornamented cyrtocone, Carboniferous, UK


TqB

Recommended Posts

This post is prompted by finding a near complete specimen of Cornuella cf. ornata, Brigantian, (Mississippian) shale above the Four Fathom Limestone. Co. Durham, UK. 

 

Apart from one fragment from the early 19th century I can find nothing comparable in the UK literature.. 

Fine specimens have been found in Russia from the Serpukhovian Stage (upper Mississippian, slightly later than this one).

See at the end of the post for both of these.

 

I previously had just a single, small fragment which was a mystery. A friend then gave me another fine 3D fragment from Scotland and this was kindly identified by a Russian collector on another forum (@valh on here, :) thank you Valerij!). 

Details on TFF here: ornamented orthocone, scotland

 

Here's my new specimen which was in a wet, disintegrating mudstone.

I held it together in the field with cyanoacrylate then dried it for a few days. 

Prepping was with a scalpel under a 20x microscope, consolidating the matrix and shell with 5-10% paraloid as I went along. (Took about 25 hours I think.)

It's too fragile to risk air abrading - the shell was already gone from the living chamber and barely attached to the rest of it.

IMG_2637.thumb.jpg.8d230d618232de8cbfd542dfeba52872.jpg

59b508ecf1022_IMG_2637(1).thumb.jpg.1c40afa5006975d74cdabbd99210978f.jpg

 

As collected:

IMG_2594.thumb.jpg.e0967598be7f2d345e9642e36029c77a.jpg

 

The first UK reference is Orthocera rugosa, Fleming 1828, a fragmentary specimen with a description only.

This was figured in 1835 in Phillips "Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire" Vol. 2, plate 21, no. 16 naming it as Orthoceras rugosum Fleming.

I can't find another figured specimen in UK literature. (Phillips simply gives "Northumberland" as the locality - the next county up from Durham.)

59b502b88bb18_ScreenShot2017-08-26at12_41_32.jpg.4824043909c34159313c90eed92cfbd6.jpg

 

 

Below is the plate of Russian Cornuella ornata (Eichwald) from Shimansky, 1968.

(Shimansky, V. N., 1968: Kamennougolniye Orthoceratida, Oncoceratida, Actinoceratida i Bactritida (Carboniferous Orthoceratida, Oncocerida, Actinoceratida and Bactritida). Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta, vol. 117, p. 1–151, pls. 1–20. (in Russian).

59b50ac19a7bb_ScreenShot2017-08-26at14_03_01.thumb.jpg.e0d0cca00b0fdc7fe2ac45fa80272bd0.jpg

 

And here's my original mystery fragment:

IMG_0904.thumb.jpg.2a237a85c2dccd25274a920f27c331ea.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • I found this Informative 3

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more specimen: while prepping the previous one, I suddenly realised that a flattened fossil from the same bed that I'd had for years and IDd cursorily as a Calamites tip is in fact a compressed Cornuella impression.

Making three from here. :)

 

IMG_2608.thumb.jpg.469db1645b4eff64ba355ae1c345c1a2.jpg

IMG_2609.thumb.jpg.203ee18a66a3220375f162ab7f56f15e.jpg

 

For completeness on this thread, here's the beautifully detailed Ayrshire fragment (Dockra Limestone) that was posted before. The collector who gave it to me said that other, not so good, fragments were in the same shale bed but it has now been quarried away (commercial quarrying, not collectors...).

It's 26.5mm long.

IMG_0887.thumb.jpg.b35479b32a96be9358e818942d154280.jpg

 

  • I found this Informative 1

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking into the possibility that this is a (hypseloconid) monoplacophoran.(NOT saying that it is,BTW)

Edit:Stinchcombe mentions C.Parva as a monoplacophoran,that's why.

(he also seems to describe Orthoconus striatus ,BTWj

Russian taxonomy in those days might have been different from the rest of the world for geopolitical reasons

Large nowakiid or dacryoconarid of some kind??

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, doushantuo said:

I'm looking into the possibility that this is a (hypseloconid) monoplacophoran.

Edit:Stinchcombe mentions C.Parva as a monoplacophoran,that's why.

(he also seem to describe Orthoconus striatus ,BTWj

Russian taxonomy in those days might have been different from the rest of the world for geopolitical reasons

Tentaculitid of some kind??

 

I've seen that, Cambrian/Ordovician things, and if the genus is Stinchcomb 1986 he was predated by Shimansky 1968.

This one's definitely a nautiloid , the last couple of camerae before the living chambers are clear in my specimen. 

And Fleming's specimen, with chambers and siphuncle. (Not come across tentaculitids in the Carboniferous?)

59b5263ee1d63_ScreenShot2017-08-26at13_02_46.jpg.6eed6d3df89c9c95b34a97ef34bddba6.jpg

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay,after all you have the specimen:P

Judging from fig 10 in the Shimansky,it would have to be cephalopod,I guess

My ability to read Cyrillic is very limited,alas

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations on this important find, Tarquin! Your ability to prep such fragile specimens so wonderfully is amazing to me! :)

 

Leah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And kudo's for the research,very thorough.

Amazing prep effort too.

 

Mouthwatering fossil ,but I didn't expect any less from the Collections Manager:D

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's beautiful fossil, not to mention the rarity! Nice find!

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jewelonly said:

Congratulations on this important find, Tarquin! Your ability to prep such fragile specimens so wonderfully is amazing to me! :)

 

Leah

Thank you, Leah, much appreciated!

 

57 minutes ago, doushantuo said:

And kudo's for the research,very thorough.

Amazing prep effort too.

 

Mouthwatering fossil ,but I didn't expect any less from the Collections Manager:D

Thanks again - and for your discursive input as always! :D

 

52 minutes ago, WhodamanHD said:

That's beautiful fossil, not to mention the rarity! Nice find!

Thank you! The ornament is certainly remarkable.

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...